Epistemological Pluralism in Social Sciences: A Critical Study of Methods and Approaches

This study seeks to explore the epistemological foundations of social sciences through a critical analysis of three main frameworks: positivism, interpretivism, and critical realism. While positivism has contributed to advancing experimental social research based on quantitative measurement and objectivity, interpretivism has highlighted the importance of the subjective meanings individuals assign to their actions, paving the way for qualitative research methods. On the other hand, critical realism offers an approach that integrates both perspectives by recognizing the existence of independent social structures while emphasizing that social and cultural contexts shape our knowledge of them. The article also examines recent epistemological shifts, including feminist and postcolonial critiques, which call for a rethinking of traditional methods of knowledge production. These shifts emphasize the necessity of including the voices and experiences of marginalized groups. Based on this analysis, the paper advocates for methodological pluralism and epistemological flexibility as essential tools for understanding complex social phenomena. This study presents an integrated research framework that igor deep interpretive analysis, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of social reality. The article concludes that social sciences must move beyond traditional methodological divides and adopt a more pluralistic and integrated approach to address contemporary social challenges effectively.

Publication Details

Journal
Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Critical Realism in Sociology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epistemological Pluralism in Social Sciences: A Critical Study of Methods and Approaches

Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada)
Critical Realism in Sociology
article

Epistemological Pluralism in Social Sciences: A Critical Study of Methods and Approaches

article en

Abstract

This study seeks to explore the epistemological foundations of social sciences through a critical analysis of three main frameworks: positivism, interpretivism, and critical realism. While positivism has contributed to advancing experimental social research based on quantitative measurement and objectivity, interpretivism has highlighted the importance of the subjective meanings individuals assign to their actions, paving the way for qualitative research methods. On the other hand, critical realism offers an approach that integrates both perspectives by recognizing the existence of independent social structures while emphasizing that social and cultural contexts shape our knowledge of them. The article also examines recent epistemological shifts, including feminist and postcolonial critiques, which call for a rethinking of traditional methods of knowledge production. These shifts emphasize the necessity of including the voices and experiences of marginalized groups. Based on this analysis, the paper advocates for methodological pluralism and epistemological flexibility as essential tools for understanding complex social phenomena. This study presents an integrated research framework that igor deep interpretive analysis, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of social reality. The article concludes that social sciences must move beyond traditional methodological divides and adopt a more pluralistic and integrated approach to address contemporary social challenges effectively.

Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Critical Realism in Sociology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.