El interviniente en Colombia.: Una propuesta de reinterpretación a la luz de la teoría de los delitos de infracción del deber

The objective of this paper is to determine what should be the scope, configuration and limits of the figure of the intervener enshrined in the fourth paragraph of Article 30 of the Colombian Criminal Code, taking into account that the current interpretation of the Supreme Court of Justice has been the subject of innumerable criticisms by national and foreign doctrine. During the development of this article, premises will be established from which it will be concluded that there is an undeniable need to reinterpret this figure to adapt it to the theoretical and constitutional postulates that govern the distinction between perpetrators and participants in our legal system. Once this has been done, a renewed interpretation capable of overcoming all the problems will be proposed.