Dog- friendly workplaces: understanding what works and lessons learned through reflexive thematic analysis

The demand for pet-friendly practices has increased since the global pandemic, with some employees reporting a preference for working alongside their companion dogs. Despite increased scholarly interest in pet-friendly practices, gaps exist in understanding their real-world impact. This study examines companion-dog-friendly offices postpandemic, focusing on perceived antecedents and outcomes of pet-friendly practices. It aims to identify what works, what does not, and lessons learned. It draws on expertise from the animal welfare and the industrial, work, and organizational psychology sectors. Employing a qualitative approach, this study utilized semistructured, one-hour interviews with 14 participants who had experienced working in a dog-friendly office for a minimum of six months. The sample for this study comprised dog owners who brought their pet dogs to the office, dog owners who opted not to bring their pet dogs to the office, and non–dog owners who worked alongside colleagues who brought their pet dogs to the office. Analysis followed the six phases of reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2019). The findings highlighted six pertinent themes relating to antecedents for sustainable pet-friendly practices and outcomes for organizations, teams, and individuals: (1) the impact of dog presence on well-being; (2) the need for organizational congruence with dog-friendly practices; (3) power dynamics engendered by dog-friendly practices; (4) presentation to the outside world; (5) continuous responsibility; (6) forethoughts and expectations. There was coherence across the six themes, regardless of the work environment, whether it was a corporate, nonprofit, or start-up setting. Interestingly, and perhaps unexpectedly, some of the non–dog owners in the participant sample emerged as among the strongest advocates for dog-friendly workplaces, while some dog owners’ discourse highlighted their reservations about an office full of multihousehold dogs. Dog ownership status does not appear to be indicative of a positive attitude toward a dog-friendly office environment. In conclusion, in the rapidly changing world of work, companion dogs have the innate ability to provide support to humans. The option to bring a companion dog to work can be considered an innovative and cost-effective reasonable adjustment. It can also be a component of an organizational well-being strategy. Dog-friendly office practices have the potential to be part of a broader corporate vision where organizations provide employees with choices in where, when, and how they work, thereby supporting individual needs and preferences.

Publication Details

Journal
BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London)
Published
2024-11-04
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dog- friendly workplaces: understanding what works and lessons learned through reflexive thematic analysis

2 citations
BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London)
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.10
article

Dog- friendly workplaces: understanding what works and lessons learned through reflexive thematic analysis

article en
2 citations

Abstract

The demand for pet-friendly practices has increased since the global pandemic, with some employees reporting a preference for working alongside their companion dogs. Despite increased scholarly interest in pet-friendly practices, gaps exist in understanding their real-world impact. This study examines companion-dog-friendly offices postpandemic, focusing on perceived antecedents and outcomes of pet-friendly practices. It aims to identify what works, what does not, and lessons learned. It draws on expertise from the animal welfare and the industrial, work, and organizational psychology sectors. Employing a qualitative approach, this study utilized semistructured, one-hour interviews with 14 participants who had experienced working in a dog-friendly office for a minimum of six months. The sample for this study comprised dog owners who brought their pet dogs to the office, dog owners who opted not to bring their pet dogs to the office, and non–dog owners who worked alongside colleagues who brought their pet dogs to the office. Analysis followed the six phases of reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2019). The findings highlighted six pertinent themes relating to antecedents for sustainable pet-friendly practices and outcomes for organizations, teams, and individuals: (1) the impact of dog presence on well-being; (2) the need for organizational congruence with dog-friendly practices; (3) power dynamics engendered by dog-friendly practices; (4) presentation to the outside world; (5) continuous responsibility; (6) forethoughts and expectations. There was coherence across the six themes, regardless of the work environment, whether it was a corporate, nonprofit, or start-up setting. Interestingly, and perhaps unexpectedly, some of the non–dog owners in the participant sample emerged as among the strongest advocates for dog-friendly workplaces, while some dog owners’ discourse highlighted their reservations about an office full of multihousehold dogs. Dog ownership status does not appear to be indicative of a positive attitude toward a dog-friendly office environment. In conclusion, in the rapidly changing world of work, companion dogs have the innate ability to provide support to humans. The option to bring a companion dog to work can be considered an innovative and cost-effective reasonable adjustment. It can also be a component of an organizational well-being strategy. Dog-friendly office practices have the potential to be part of a broader corporate vision where organizations provide employees with choices in where, when, and how they work, thereby supporting individual needs and preferences.

BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.