Double Materiality as a Discourse : Transparency, Legitimacy, and Strategic Framing under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive

The implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) introduces a new regulatory landscape for corporate transparency in the European Union, requiring companies to assess both financial and impact materiality. However, the directive leaves room for interpretive discretion, raising questions about how companies construct and communicate their double materiality assessments in practice. This thesis addresses that gap by examining how seven major Danish and Swedish construction and real estate companies articulate materiality, stakeholder engagement, and sustainability responsibilities in their 2023/2024 sustainability reports. The aim of this study is to explore how double materiality is discursively constructed, visualized, and strategically framed under the CSRD, and to what extent this fosters substantive transparency or symbolic compliance. Through a critical discourse analysis inspired by Fairclough, the study analyzes sustainability reports from Denmark and Sweden. The analysis is guided by discourse theory, institutional theory, stakeholder theory, and legitimacy theory. The findings reveal that while all companies formally adopt the CSRD’s double materiality language, their interpretations are shaped by institutional pressures and communicative choices. Materiality matrices often function as tools of narrative control, prioritizing regulatory-visible topics like climate and governance, while reframing or omitting systemic concerns such as biodiversity or affected communities. Stakeholder engagement is referenced vaguely and rarely demonstrates dialogical influence. These patterns suggest that transparency under the CSRD is not merely a technical outcome, but a negotiated, discursive process. The study contributes to sustainability reporting scholarship by showing how regulation is translated into organizational language, reinforcing legitimacy while leaving room for discretion.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Double Materiality as a Discourse : Transparency, Legitimacy, and Strategic Framing under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Double Materiality as a Discourse : Transparency, Legitimacy, and Strategic Framing under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive

article en

Abstract

The implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) introduces a new regulatory landscape for corporate transparency in the European Union, requiring companies to assess both financial and impact materiality. However, the directive leaves room for interpretive discretion, raising questions about how companies construct and communicate their double materiality assessments in practice. This thesis addresses that gap by examining how seven major Danish and Swedish construction and real estate companies articulate materiality, stakeholder engagement, and sustainability responsibilities in their 2023/2024 sustainability reports. The aim of this study is to explore how double materiality is discursively constructed, visualized, and strategically framed under the CSRD, and to what extent this fosters substantive transparency or symbolic compliance. Through a critical discourse analysis inspired by Fairclough, the study analyzes sustainability reports from Denmark and Sweden. The analysis is guided by discourse theory, institutional theory, stakeholder theory, and legitimacy theory. The findings reveal that while all companies formally adopt the CSRD’s double materiality language, their interpretations are shaped by institutional pressures and communicative choices. Materiality matrices often function as tools of narrative control, prioritizing regulatory-visible topics like climate and governance, while reframing or omitting systemic concerns such as biodiversity or affected communities. Stakeholder engagement is referenced vaguely and rarely demonstrates dialogical influence. These patterns suggest that transparency under the CSRD is not merely a technical outcome, but a negotiated, discursive process. The study contributes to sustainability reporting scholarship by showing how regulation is translated into organizational language, reinforcing legitimacy while leaving room for discretion.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Double Materiality as a Discourse : Transparency, Legitimacy, and Strategic Framing under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS