Domestic Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence Laws as Global Business and Human Rights Regulation

The last decade has witnessed a paradigm shift in business and human rights (BHR) from soft law to hard law. Although the Global South has pushed for an international treaty, legislators in Europe turned their focus from international law to domestic mandatory human rights due diligence (mHRDD) laws with extraterritorial implications, enforcing localized human rights standards globally. This Article examines the impact of mHRDD legislation as global BHR regulation from a Third World Approaches to International Law perspective. The Article makes three contributions. First, it argues that the current divide between the Global North and South continues a historical struggle over setting international rules on multinationals. Second, it illustrates how Eurocentric mHRDD laws could become de facto global BHR regulation and perpetuate historical inequalities. Third, it examines the ramifications of mHRDD laws on the ongoing BHR treaty process, advocating the latter as a more equitable and effective solution.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-01-01
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domestic Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence Laws as Global Business and Human Rights Regulation

1 citations
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Corporate Law and Human Rights
2.76
article

Domestic Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence Laws as Global Business and Human Rights Regulation

article en
1 citations

Abstract

The last decade has witnessed a paradigm shift in business and human rights (BHR) from soft law to hard law. Although the Global South has pushed for an international treaty, legislators in Europe turned their focus from international law to domestic mandatory human rights due diligence (mHRDD) laws with extraterritorial implications, enforcing localized human rights standards globally. This Article examines the impact of mHRDD legislation as global BHR regulation from a Third World Approaches to International Law perspective. The Article makes three contributions. First, it argues that the current divide between the Global North and South continues a historical struggle over setting international rules on multinationals. Second, it illustrates how Eurocentric mHRDD laws could become de facto global BHR regulation and perpetuate historical inequalities. Third, it examines the ramifications of mHRDD laws on the ongoing BHR treaty process, advocating the latter as a more equitable and effective solution.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.