Development of a Prognostic Nomogram Incorporating the Naples Prognostic Score for Postoperative Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients

Xue-Lian Xu,1 Hao Cheng1,2 1Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, 453100, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Hao Cheng, Email [email protected]: The Naples prognostic score (NPS) and its relation to the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have been inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between NPS and the prognosis of postoperative OSCC patients. Additionally, the study sought to develop a new nomogram for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).Methods: The study included 576 OSCC patients who underwent surgical treatment at two hospitals between August 2008 and June 2018. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. Subsequently, two nomograms were developed to predict DFS and OS based on these factors and underwent rigorous validation.Results: The median DFS and OS were 31.5 months and 36.5 months, respectively. Significant differences in DFS and OS were observed among patients with different NPS scores. Adjuvant radiotherapy, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), extranodal extension (ENE), NPS, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, surgical safety margin, eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS), and systemic inflammation score (SIS) were identified as independent predictors of DFS and OS. In the training cohort, the nomogram’s concordance index (C-index) for predicting DFS and OS was 0.701 and 0.693, respectively. In the validation group, the corresponding values were 0.642 and 0.635, respectively. Calibration plots confirmed a high level of agreement between the model’s predictions and actual outcomes. Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated the nomogram’s good clinical utility. Additionally, patients in the low-risk group did not benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy, while those in the medium-risk and high-risk group could benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.Conclusion: NPS significantly influences the prognosis of OSCC patients following surgery. The nomogram developed in this study holds significant clinical application potential. The low-risk subgroup of patients was not required to undergo postoperative radiotherapy.Keywords: oral squamous cell carcinoma, naples prognostic score, nomogram, risk stratification, radiotherapy

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Prognostic Nomogram Incorporating the Naples Prognostic Score for Postoperative Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

Development of a Prognostic Nomogram Incorporating the Naples Prognostic Score for Postoperative Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients

article en

Abstract

Xue-Lian Xu,1 Hao Cheng1,2 1Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, 453100, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Hao Cheng, Email [email protected]: The Naples prognostic score (NPS) and its relation to the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have been inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between NPS and the prognosis of postoperative OSCC patients. Additionally, the study sought to develop a new nomogram for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).Methods: The study included 576 OSCC patients who underwent surgical treatment at two hospitals between August 2008 and June 2018. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. Subsequently, two nomograms were developed to predict DFS and OS based on these factors and underwent rigorous validation.Results: The median DFS and OS were 31.5 months and 36.5 months, respectively. Significant differences in DFS and OS were observed among patients with different NPS scores. Adjuvant radiotherapy, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), extranodal extension (ENE), NPS, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, surgical safety margin, eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS), and systemic inflammation score (SIS) were identified as independent predictors of DFS and OS. In the training cohort, the nomogram’s concordance index (C-index) for predicting DFS and OS was 0.701 and 0.693, respectively. In the validation group, the corresponding values were 0.642 and 0.635, respectively. Calibration plots confirmed a high level of agreement between the model’s predictions and actual outcomes. Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated the nomogram’s good clinical utility. Additionally, patients in the low-risk group did not benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy, while those in the medium-risk and high-risk group could benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.Conclusion: NPS significantly influences the prognosis of OSCC patients following surgery. The nomogram developed in this study holds significant clinical application potential. The low-risk subgroup of patients was not required to undergo postoperative radiotherapy.Keywords: oral squamous cell carcinoma, naples prognostic score, nomogram, risk stratification, radiotherapy

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.