Differences in Race and Gender of Retired Servicemembers in the Decision to Reenlist

The purpose of the study was to examine the race and gender differences among retired enlisted service members in work self-determination regarding the decision to reenlist. Existing research indicated little to no information regarding these factors. The independent variables are race and gender, and the dependent variable is work self-determination in the decision-making to re-enlist. This research utilized an adapted version of the Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale, an 18-item assessment of work motivation theoretically grounded in self-determination theory. Only retired active-duty enlisted service members between the ranks of E-5 through E-9 were surveyed. Regarding race, this study only included Caucasian and Black or African American service members because they account for the largest two groups in the military. The data analysis technique was a 2X2 analysis of variance with a nonexperimental comparative design. The results from this research showed no significant differences in views on military service between women and men, regardless of race, gender, or their interaction, in the re-enlistment decision-making process of retired enlisted service members. This indicates that the sample did not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the effect exists. However, this lack of evidence does not confirm the non-existence of the effect. This study may contribute to social change by promoting additional insight into military and work turnover studies as well as gender studies. Practical implications may include assisting in the retention of service members, thus maintaining a ready reserve.

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarWorks (Walden University)
Published
2024-08-20
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Race and Gender of Retired Servicemembers in the Decision to Reenlist

ScholarWorks (Walden University)
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

Differences in Race and Gender of Retired Servicemembers in the Decision to Reenlist

article en

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the race and gender differences among retired enlisted service members in work self-determination regarding the decision to reenlist. Existing research indicated little to no information regarding these factors. The independent variables are race and gender, and the dependent variable is work self-determination in the decision-making to re-enlist. This research utilized an adapted version of the Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale, an 18-item assessment of work motivation theoretically grounded in self-determination theory. Only retired active-duty enlisted service members between the ranks of E-5 through E-9 were surveyed. Regarding race, this study only included Caucasian and Black or African American service members because they account for the largest two groups in the military. The data analysis technique was a 2X2 analysis of variance with a nonexperimental comparative design. The results from this research showed no significant differences in views on military service between women and men, regardless of race, gender, or their interaction, in the re-enlistment decision-making process of retired enlisted service members. This indicates that the sample did not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the effect exists. However, this lack of evidence does not confirm the non-existence of the effect. This study may contribute to social change by promoting additional insight into military and work turnover studies as well as gender studies. Practical implications may include assisting in the retention of service members, thus maintaining a ready reserve.

ScholarWorks (Walden University)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.