From Cuffs to Compassion: The Impact of Relational Policing De-escalation Approaches on Public Perceptions of Safety, Satisfaction, Procedural Justice, and Police Legitimacy.

Academics, policy makers, and the public have called for the prioritization of de- escalation training and use in public-police interactions to reduce police use of force (PUoF) (e.g., Dubé, 2016; Iacobucci, 2014; Todak, 2017; Wortley et al., 2021). In response to various calls to action, the Ministry of the Solicitor General launched the Ontario Public-Police Interactions Training Aid Framework in 2023, which emphasizes the importance of utilizing a relational policing approach in public-police interactions (see Lavoie et al., 2022). However, despite changes in police training frameworks, relatively little is known about PUoF in Canada (Wortley et al., 2021), with similarly minimal research evaluating public perceptions of police de-escalation (Todak & White, 2019). This experimental study therefore focused on examining public perceptions of police following the observation of a brief, animated, ambiguous public- police interaction involving elevated risks to public safety. This study consisted of a 2x2 factorial design (suspect threat: weapon present, weapon absent; policing approach: relational, standard authoritative) to evaluate whether the type of police approach, namely a relational or standard authoritative approach, given variations in the presence of safety risks, shaped participants’ perceptions of safety, police legitimacy, procedural justice, and satisfaction in public-police interactions. The sample consisted of 217 participants, who completed a 42-question survey related to the dependent measures and participant demographic information. Results indicated that participants perceived relational policing to be a more safe, legitimate, procedurally just, and satisfactory policing approach, compared to a standard authoritative approach in an ambiguous public-police interaction with elevated risks to public safety. These findings present optimistic opportunities to enhance public perceptions of the police and foster more positive public-police interactions in the future, using relational policing approaches.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Cuffs to Compassion: The Impact of Relational Policing De-escalation Approaches on Public Perceptions of Safety, Satisfaction, Procedural Justice, and Police Legitimacy.

Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Policing Practices and Perceptions
article

From Cuffs to Compassion: The Impact of Relational Policing De-escalation Approaches on Public Perceptions of Safety, Satisfaction, Procedural Justice, and Police Legitimacy.

article en

Abstract

Academics, policy makers, and the public have called for the prioritization of de- escalation training and use in public-police interactions to reduce police use of force (PUoF) (e.g., Dubé, 2016; Iacobucci, 2014; Todak, 2017; Wortley et al., 2021). In response to various calls to action, the Ministry of the Solicitor General launched the Ontario Public-Police Interactions Training Aid Framework in 2023, which emphasizes the importance of utilizing a relational policing approach in public-police interactions (see Lavoie et al., 2022). However, despite changes in police training frameworks, relatively little is known about PUoF in Canada (Wortley et al., 2021), with similarly minimal research evaluating public perceptions of police de-escalation (Todak & White, 2019). This experimental study therefore focused on examining public perceptions of police following the observation of a brief, animated, ambiguous public- police interaction involving elevated risks to public safety. This study consisted of a 2x2 factorial design (suspect threat: weapon present, weapon absent; policing approach: relational, standard authoritative) to evaluate whether the type of police approach, namely a relational or standard authoritative approach, given variations in the presence of safety risks, shaped participants’ perceptions of safety, police legitimacy, procedural justice, and satisfaction in public-police interactions. The sample consisted of 217 participants, who completed a 42-question survey related to the dependent measures and participant demographic information. Results indicated that participants perceived relational policing to be a more safe, legitimate, procedurally just, and satisfactory policing approach, compared to a standard authoritative approach in an ambiguous public-police interaction with elevated risks to public safety. These findings present optimistic opportunities to enhance public perceptions of the police and foster more positive public-police interactions in the future, using relational policing approaches.

Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.