A decision support process for the selection of sustainable public ICT project investments

The allocation of limited public resources to public investments necessitates selecting projects with the highest social and economic value, along with the greatest likelihood of success. However, the literature lacks well-defined criteria to measure the alignment of such projects with national policies, social benefits, and institutional capabilities. This paper aims to fill this gap by presenting a process methodology and a set of criteria for evaluating and prioritizing public sector ICT projects. A project selection process is defined with a comprehensive criteria set, and it was tested on 11 carefully selected information and communication technology projects. A process has been defined consisting of prerequisite elimination, criteria weighting, project scoring, and verification. Both AHP and TOPSIS methods were utilized. The study also attempts to measure social benefits with respect to Türkiye’s national priorities, through more tangible sub-criteria. To the best of our available knowledge, the study provides the most comprehensive set of criteria for selecting ICT investment projects in the public sector. The findings reveal that projects aligned with national priorities and providing high social benefits were ranked highest. The fact that project criteria provide feedback from a broad perspective shows that information systems can also support project maturation, along with project selection.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A decision support process for the selection of sustainable public ICT project investments

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
E-Government and Public Services
article

A decision support process for the selection of sustainable public ICT project investments

article en

Abstract

The allocation of limited public resources to public investments necessitates selecting projects with the highest social and economic value, along with the greatest likelihood of success. However, the literature lacks well-defined criteria to measure the alignment of such projects with national policies, social benefits, and institutional capabilities. This paper aims to fill this gap by presenting a process methodology and a set of criteria for evaluating and prioritizing public sector ICT projects. A project selection process is defined with a comprehensive criteria set, and it was tested on 11 carefully selected information and communication technology projects. A process has been defined consisting of prerequisite elimination, criteria weighting, project scoring, and verification. Both AHP and TOPSIS methods were utilized. The study also attempts to measure social benefits with respect to Türkiye’s national priorities, through more tangible sub-criteria. To the best of our available knowledge, the study provides the most comprehensive set of criteria for selecting ICT investment projects in the public sector. The findings reveal that projects aligned with national priorities and providing high social benefits were ranked highest. The fact that project criteria provide feedback from a broad perspective shows that information systems can also support project maturation, along with project selection.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.