Constructing Identity and Threat : The AfD's rhetorical strategies in the 2025 elective campaign

This study examines the rhetorical strategies that were utilized by the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) throughout the 2025 German federal election campaign. Employing a critical qualitative content analysis of nine speeches, held in the parliament, the study assesses how the party facilitated themes of victimization, enemy construction, and political self-legitimization. Founding this study on framing theory as well as classical rhetoric after Aristotle, the study aims at illustrating the strategic usage of emotional appeals, moral assessments, and logical reasoning to mobilize fear, assign responsibility, and develop the party as the only justified political actor. AfD rhetoric verbalized immigration as an urgent threat and delegitimized political opponents, which actively shapes public discourse and challenges democratic norms and standards. The study contributes to understand the rhetoric mechanisms partially responsible for fostering the rise of the far-right party and stresses the implications that has for human rights.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing Identity and Threat : The AfD's rhetorical strategies in the 2025 elective campaign

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Constructing Identity and Threat : The AfD's rhetorical strategies in the 2025 elective campaign

article en

Abstract

This study examines the rhetorical strategies that were utilized by the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) throughout the 2025 German federal election campaign. Employing a critical qualitative content analysis of nine speeches, held in the parliament, the study assesses how the party facilitated themes of victimization, enemy construction, and political self-legitimization. Founding this study on framing theory as well as classical rhetoric after Aristotle, the study aims at illustrating the strategic usage of emotional appeals, moral assessments, and logical reasoning to mobilize fear, assign responsibility, and develop the party as the only justified political actor. AfD rhetoric verbalized immigration as an urgent threat and delegitimized political opponents, which actively shapes public discourse and challenges democratic norms and standards. The study contributes to understand the rhetoric mechanisms partially responsible for fostering the rise of the far-right party and stresses the implications that has for human rights.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.