The compounding effect: how neighbourhood dynamics shape police deployment and use of force

Background: Calls for service are a major driver of police activity, yet their role in shaping the neighbourhood distribution of police use of force remains under-explored. Understanding where and why force is used requires examining how these calls cluster spatially—and how police interpret and respond to them. Methods: Using administrative data from an English police force (2018–2021), we analyse how neighbourhood characteristics—including mental health prevalence, racial composition, socioeconomic deprivation, residential instability, and crime rates—predict patterns of police deployment and use of force. We link call-for-service records with force incident data to trace the process from (a) call initiation to (b) priority grading, (c) TASER-equipped officer deployment, and (d) eventual use of force. Results: Calls for service are concentrated in disadvantaged neighbourhoods with elevated mental health need. These areas are also more likely to experience police use of force (including TASER). Yet public demand is refracted through institutional filters—such as call grading and officer deployment decisions—that concentrate how and where force is ultimately applied. Conclusions: Police use of force does not result from isolated actions, but from a sequence of decisions that compound the existing spatial clustering of public calls for service. Structural disadvantage, mental health distress and operational decision-making interact to concentrate force in already over-burdened communities. Addressing disproportionate use of force requires reform not only of police practice, but also of the upstream social conditions that generate repeated crisis response.

Publication Details

Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Published
2025-12-31
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The compounding effect: how neighbourhood dynamics shape police deployment and use of force

1 citations
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Policing Practices and Perceptions
8.52
article

The compounding effect: how neighbourhood dynamics shape police deployment and use of force

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Calls for service are a major driver of police activity, yet their role in shaping the neighbourhood distribution of police use of force remains under-explored. Understanding where and why force is used requires examining how these calls cluster spatially—and how police interpret and respond to them. Methods: Using administrative data from an English police force (2018–2021), we analyse how neighbourhood characteristics—including mental health prevalence, racial composition, socioeconomic deprivation, residential instability, and crime rates—predict patterns of police deployment and use of force. We link call-for-service records with force incident data to trace the process from (a) call initiation to (b) priority grading, (c) TASER-equipped officer deployment, and (d) eventual use of force. Results: Calls for service are concentrated in disadvantaged neighbourhoods with elevated mental health need. These areas are also more likely to experience police use of force (including TASER). Yet public demand is refracted through institutional filters—such as call grading and officer deployment decisions—that concentrate how and where force is ultimately applied. Conclusions: Police use of force does not result from isolated actions, but from a sequence of decisions that compound the existing spatial clustering of public calls for service. Structural disadvantage, mental health distress and operational decision-making interact to concentrate force in already over-burdened communities. Addressing disproportionate use of force requires reform not only of police practice, but also of the upstream social conditions that generate repeated crisis response.

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Economic and Social Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.