Complications and Clinical Outcomes of Conventional Surgery Versus Subcutaneous Ureteral Bypass (SUB) in the Management of Feline Ureteral Urolithiasis

Objectives To compare complications and outcomes between conventional surgery (ureterotomy or ureteroneocystostomy) and Subcutaneous Ureteral Bypass (SUB) in cats with ureteral obstruction due to urolithiasis. Methods This retrospective study included cats with ureteral obstruction from urolithiasis treated surgically between 2015 and 2023. Cats were divided into two groups: one treated with conventional surgery (ureterotomy or ureteroneocystostomy) and the other with SUB. Data collected from medical records included signalment, history, type of surgery, complications, and follow-up. Results Forty-two cats were included (median age 6.3 years). Bilateral obstruction occurred in 40% (17/42) of cases. Eleven cats underwent conventional surgery (9 ureterotomies, 2 ureteroneocystostomies), and 31 had a SUB placed. Surgical times were similar between the two groups (mean of 2 hours). No intraoperative complications occurred. In the conventional surgery group, one major immediate postoperative complication (uroperitoneum) was noted, while a long-term complication rate of 54% (6/11) was observed including stenosis (4/6), recurrent urolithiasis (1/6) and bacterial infection (1/6). The long-term complications reported for the SUB group were bacterial infections in 26% (8/31) and mineralization-related obstructions in 22% (7/31). The overall long-term survival rate was 86%. Statement (conclusions) In this first retrospective study comparing conventional surgery and SUB placement for the treatment of ureteral obstruction in cats secondary to urolithiasis, both techniques yielded long-term positive outcomes. Conventional surgery had a high long-term complication rate, particularly stenosis requiring further surgery, but remains suitable for selected cases (single urolith). However, the SUB remains the preferred treatment in most cases. Further studies are needed to identify risk factors for complications.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège)
Published
2025-03-22
Primary Topic
Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complications and Clinical Outcomes of Conventional Surgery Versus Subcutaneous Ureteral Bypass (SUB) in the Management of Feline Ureteral Urolithiasis

Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège)
Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
article

Complications and Clinical Outcomes of Conventional Surgery Versus Subcutaneous Ureteral Bypass (SUB) in the Management of Feline Ureteral Urolithiasis

article en

Abstract

Objectives To compare complications and outcomes between conventional surgery (ureterotomy or ureteroneocystostomy) and Subcutaneous Ureteral Bypass (SUB) in cats with ureteral obstruction due to urolithiasis. Methods This retrospective study included cats with ureteral obstruction from urolithiasis treated surgically between 2015 and 2023. Cats were divided into two groups: one treated with conventional surgery (ureterotomy or ureteroneocystostomy) and the other with SUB. Data collected from medical records included signalment, history, type of surgery, complications, and follow-up. Results Forty-two cats were included (median age 6.3 years). Bilateral obstruction occurred in 40% (17/42) of cases. Eleven cats underwent conventional surgery (9 ureterotomies, 2 ureteroneocystostomies), and 31 had a SUB placed. Surgical times were similar between the two groups (mean of 2 hours). No intraoperative complications occurred. In the conventional surgery group, one major immediate postoperative complication (uroperitoneum) was noted, while a long-term complication rate of 54% (6/11) was observed including stenosis (4/6), recurrent urolithiasis (1/6) and bacterial infection (1/6). The long-term complications reported for the SUB group were bacterial infections in 26% (8/31) and mineralization-related obstructions in 22% (7/31). The overall long-term survival rate was 86%. Statement (conclusions) In this first retrospective study comparing conventional surgery and SUB placement for the treatment of ureteral obstruction in cats secondary to urolithiasis, both techniques yielded long-term positive outcomes. Conventional surgery had a high long-term complication rate, particularly stenosis requiring further surgery, but remains suitable for selected cases (single urolith). However, the SUB remains the preferred treatment in most cases. Further studies are needed to identify risk factors for complications.

Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Complications and Clinical Outcomes of Conventional Surgery Versus Subcutaneous Ureteral Bypass (SUB) in the Management of Feline Ureteral Urolithiasis · Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS