A comparison of different perspectives for AI driven detection of cooking-steps in real time

This report studies real time detection of when a user is done with a step in a recipe with the help of multimodal language models. The purpose is to compare the performance and time of two state-of-the-art models LLaVA 1.6 and Gemini 2.5 Flash. This is done from different camera angles from both first and third person views. The data consists of 45 different cooking scenes recorded from 5 different angles. The models are simulated to run in real time by incremental access to new data. The results show that Gemini has essentially better performance then LLaVA but Gemini also have issues with consistently classifying scenes as done or not done. The conclusion is that reasoning models give better performance when detecting when a cooking step is finished.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of different perspectives for AI driven detection of cooking-steps in real time

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
article

A comparison of different perspectives for AI driven detection of cooking-steps in real time

article en

Abstract

This report studies real time detection of when a user is done with a step in a recipe with the help of multimodal language models. The purpose is to compare the performance and time of two state-of-the-art models LLaVA 1.6 and Gemini 2.5 Flash. This is done from different camera angles from both first and third person views. The data consists of 45 different cooking scenes recorded from 5 different angles. The models are simulated to run in real time by incremental access to new data. The results show that Gemini has essentially better performance then LLaVA but Gemini also have issues with consistently classifying scenes as done or not done. The conclusion is that reasoning models give better performance when detecting when a cooking step is finished.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparison of different perspectives for AI driven detection of cooking-steps in real time · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS