CTEM: The Next Big Thing or Just a Buzzword? : A comparative study of CTEM and NIST CSF 2.0 in modern cyber risk management

The thesis "CTEM: The Next Big Thing or Just a Buzzword? - A comparative study of CTEM and NIST CSF 2.0 in modern cyber risk management" investigates Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) compared to the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework (NIST CSF) 2.0. Through a comparative analysis and interviews with cybersecurity professionals, the study aims to explore how CTEM can help organizations adopt a more continuous and adaptive approach to manage cybersecurity risks. The results show that CTEM offers a dynamic and proactive approach to threat management, focusing on continuous monitoring, while NIST CSF 2.0 relies more on traditional methods. It also identifies similarities and differences between the frameworks, recognizing that the continuous approach can complement the NIST CSF 2.0. That integration can strengthen the comprehensive cybersecurity strategy of organizations that addresses current and emerging threats. A combination of CTEM and NIST CSF 2.0 addresses challenges such as management support, which are discussed in the discussion. The combination can lead to sustained resilience to cyber threats and ensure a safer digital environment with economic benefits for organizations.

Publication Details

Journal
Hogskolan Ihalmstad (Halmstad University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CTEM: The Next Big Thing or Just a Buzzword? : A comparative study of CTEM and NIST CSF 2.0 in modern cyber risk management

Hogskolan Ihalmstad (Halmstad University)
Information and Cyber Security
article

CTEM: The Next Big Thing or Just a Buzzword? : A comparative study of CTEM and NIST CSF 2.0 in modern cyber risk management

article en

Abstract

The thesis "CTEM: The Next Big Thing or Just a Buzzword? - A comparative study of CTEM and NIST CSF 2.0 in modern cyber risk management" investigates Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) compared to the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework (NIST CSF) 2.0. Through a comparative analysis and interviews with cybersecurity professionals, the study aims to explore how CTEM can help organizations adopt a more continuous and adaptive approach to manage cybersecurity risks. The results show that CTEM offers a dynamic and proactive approach to threat management, focusing on continuous monitoring, while NIST CSF 2.0 relies more on traditional methods. It also identifies similarities and differences between the frameworks, recognizing that the continuous approach can complement the NIST CSF 2.0. That integration can strengthen the comprehensive cybersecurity strategy of organizations that addresses current and emerging threats. A combination of CTEM and NIST CSF 2.0 addresses challenges such as management support, which are discussed in the discussion. The combination can lead to sustained resilience to cyber threats and ensure a safer digital environment with economic benefits for organizations.

Hogskolan Ihalmstad (Halmstad University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CTEM: The Next Big Thing or Just a Buzzword? : A comparative study of CTEM and NIST CSF 2.0 in modern cyber risk management · Hogskolan Ihalmstad (Halmstad University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS