Children and Chairs, Artifacts and Reality

Where do children come from? The source of childhood—either nature or political will—is a matter not merely of chronology but of authority. Whoever makes children gets to define childhood. Legal childhood is one type of legal personhood. Legal personhood matters because legal persons bear legal rights and duties. Rights and duties direct how we act toward each other. Thus, our ideas about how persons come to be, who counts as a person, and how persons are defined in law determine in large part how we act toward persons, both other persons and ourselves. A legal person is an artifact of law with a particular function. Its function is to identify a human being, group of human beings, or class of human beings to whom a right is owed or who bears responsibility for rendering the right to some other person. So, though childhood and personhood are artifacts of law, they are not arbitrary. Even artificial persons, such as trusts and corporations, must reflect pre-existing realities about the natural persons for whose benefit we make them. Laws presuppose the natural existence and natural personhood of human beings because artificial laws are made by human beings for human purposes. Natural persons make artificial laws; laws do not make natural persons. All laws, including those laws that identify children and secure their rights, serve the function of laws by attending to who human beings actually are and by securing their well-being. The legal status of childhood is and must remain rationally determined in large part by truths about vulnerable human beings.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-05-15
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children and Chairs, Artifacts and Reality

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Law in Society and Culture
article

Children and Chairs, Artifacts and Reality

article en

Abstract

Where do children come from? The source of childhood—either nature or political will—is a matter not merely of chronology but of authority. Whoever makes children gets to define childhood. Legal childhood is one type of legal personhood. Legal personhood matters because legal persons bear legal rights and duties. Rights and duties direct how we act toward each other. Thus, our ideas about how persons come to be, who counts as a person, and how persons are defined in law determine in large part how we act toward persons, both other persons and ourselves. A legal person is an artifact of law with a particular function. Its function is to identify a human being, group of human beings, or class of human beings to whom a right is owed or who bears responsibility for rendering the right to some other person. So, though childhood and personhood are artifacts of law, they are not arbitrary. Even artificial persons, such as trusts and corporations, must reflect pre-existing realities about the natural persons for whose benefit we make them. Laws presuppose the natural existence and natural personhood of human beings because artificial laws are made by human beings for human purposes. Natural persons make artificial laws; laws do not make natural persons. All laws, including those laws that identify children and secure their rights, serve the function of laws by attending to who human beings actually are and by securing their well-being. The legal status of childhood is and must remain rationally determined in large part by truths about vulnerable human beings.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.