The Black Stories Experiment: Two Groups are Trying to Solve a Riddle Game Behind a Screen, Only One Group Is Alive

Studying large language models (LLMs) can provide valuable insights into their strengths and limitations. This study explores problem-solving capabilities of GPT-4 by comparing the model's performance in solving Black Stories riddles, to human performance. The study utilized a set of 12 adjusted Black Stories, each tested twice within the human and GPT-4 group. The experiment was conducted through text messaging for a comparable set-up. The primary measure of performance was the number of questions and hints needed to solve the riddle. Results indicated no significant difference between the groups. Qualitative results showed that GPT-4 excelled in precise questioning and creativity but often fixated on details. Humans covered broader topics and adapted the focus quickly but struggled with uncommon details. This research suggests that despite different approaches, GPT-4's performance was comparable to that of humans, demonstrating its potential as a capable participant in these types of problem solving games.

Publication Details

Journal
eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Black Stories Experiment: Two Groups are Trying to Solve a Riddle Game Behind a Screen, Only One Group Is Alive

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

The Black Stories Experiment: Two Groups are Trying to Solve a Riddle Game Behind a Screen, Only One Group Is Alive

article en

Abstract

Studying large language models (LLMs) can provide valuable insights into their strengths and limitations. This study explores problem-solving capabilities of GPT-4 by comparing the model's performance in solving Black Stories riddles, to human performance. The study utilized a set of 12 adjusted Black Stories, each tested twice within the human and GPT-4 group. The experiment was conducted through text messaging for a comparable set-up. The primary measure of performance was the number of questions and hints needed to solve the riddle. Results indicated no significant difference between the groups. Qualitative results showed that GPT-4 excelled in precise questioning and creativity but often fixated on details. Humans covered broader topics and adapted the focus quickly but struggled with uncommon details. This research suggests that despite different approaches, GPT-4's performance was comparable to that of humans, demonstrating its potential as a capable participant in these types of problem solving games.

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.