Can charcoal-based dentifrices change the color stability and roughness of bleached tooth enamel and resin composites?

Background: Given the increasing prevalence of individuals using charcoal-based dentifrices over extended periods without professional oversight, concerns have emerged regarding their potential effects. This study aimed to investigate the influence of different charcoal-based products on color change (ΔE00), gloss stability, and surface roughness of dental enamel (Intact or bleached) and resin composites subjected to 12-month simulated brushing. Material and Methods: 132 bovine crowns were randomly allocated and restored with either SS-single-shade or conventional multi-shade, NH-nanohybrid, NF- nano-filled, or BF- bulk-fill composite. A conventional toothpaste (Control), a charcoal-based toothpaste (DC) , and a charcoal-based toothpowder (PO) were evaluated corresponding to 1-, 2-, 6-, and 12-month simulated tooth brushing, respectively. Color (ΔE00) and surface roughness (Ra) were assessed at baseline and after each brushing (n=11). Gloss (GU) was assessed before and after brushing. The brushing products, as well as the enamel and composite surfaces, were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. Color change, gloss stability, and surface roughness were analyzed by a three-way repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: Significant differences were found for composite color change (ΔE00) based on brushing product (P<0.001), brushing time (P<0.001), and their interaction (P<0.001), with similar changes across charcoal-based and conventional toothpaste. After 12 months of brushing with toothpowder (PO), all composites exceeded the acceptable ΔE00 threshold. Gloss values decreased significantly (P<0.001), with greater losses in NF and NH resins. Roughness (Ra) also increased more with PO than with toothpaste. Both PO and DC significantly reduced enamel gloss, especially on bleached enamel. Conclusions: Charcoal-based toothpaste alters the morphology, roughness, gloss, and color of enamel and resin composite, similar to regular toothpaste. Toothpowder creates surface irregularities, decreasing the gloss and increasing the color change and roughness, more strongly impacting bleached enamel and composites after 12-month simulated tooth brushing.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Dental Erosion and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can charcoal-based dentifrices change the color stability and roughness of bleached tooth enamel and resin composites?

Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia)
Dental Erosion and Treatment
article

Can charcoal-based dentifrices change the color stability and roughness of bleached tooth enamel and resin composites?

article en

Abstract

Background: Given the increasing prevalence of individuals using charcoal-based dentifrices over extended periods without professional oversight, concerns have emerged regarding their potential effects. This study aimed to investigate the influence of different charcoal-based products on color change (ΔE00), gloss stability, and surface roughness of dental enamel (Intact or bleached) and resin composites subjected to 12-month simulated brushing. Material and Methods: 132 bovine crowns were randomly allocated and restored with either SS-single-shade or conventional multi-shade, NH-nanohybrid, NF- nano-filled, or BF- bulk-fill composite. A conventional toothpaste (Control), a charcoal-based toothpaste (DC) , and a charcoal-based toothpowder (PO) were evaluated corresponding to 1-, 2-, 6-, and 12-month simulated tooth brushing, respectively. Color (ΔE00) and surface roughness (Ra) were assessed at baseline and after each brushing (n=11). Gloss (GU) was assessed before and after brushing. The brushing products, as well as the enamel and composite surfaces, were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. Color change, gloss stability, and surface roughness were analyzed by a three-way repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: Significant differences were found for composite color change (ΔE00) based on brushing product (P<0.001), brushing time (P<0.001), and their interaction (P<0.001), with similar changes across charcoal-based and conventional toothpaste. After 12 months of brushing with toothpowder (PO), all composites exceeded the acceptable ΔE00 threshold. Gloss values decreased significantly (P<0.001), with greater losses in NF and NH resins. Roughness (Ra) also increased more with PO than with toothpaste. Both PO and DC significantly reduced enamel gloss, especially on bleached enamel. Conclusions: Charcoal-based toothpaste alters the morphology, roughness, gloss, and color of enamel and resin composite, similar to regular toothpaste. Toothpowder creates surface irregularities, decreasing the gloss and increasing the color change and roughness, more strongly impacting bleached enamel and composites after 12-month simulated tooth brushing.

Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Dental Erosion and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.