Assessing the influence of research quality on policy citations: Quantitative analysis finds non-academic factors more likely to influence how papers get cited in SDG policy

Addressing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires policymakers to utilise high-quality scholarly research effectively. This study explores the extent to which bibliometric indicators of research quality—field weighted citation index, journal CiteScore, author h-index and mentions—influence the likelihood of SDG-related research being cited in policy documents. Analysing metadata from over 16 million SDG-related articles revealed modest relationships between selected bibliometric indicators and policy citations. This suggests that bibliometric measures of research quality may not adequately explain policy influence, or that these metrics might not capture the essence of research excellence from a policy perspective. Importantly, the study identifies variations in research utilisation across different SDGs and highlights the potential role of non-academic factors in determining policy impact. Results provide a framework for understanding the extent to which policymakers are leveraging the best available evidence in their efforts to meet the SDGs.

Publication Details

Journal
UCL Discovery (University College London)
Published
2025-04-01
Citations
1
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the influence of research quality on policy citations: Quantitative analysis finds non-academic factors more likely to influence how papers get cited in SDG policy

1 citations
UCL Discovery (University College London)
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
1.40
article

Assessing the influence of research quality on policy citations: Quantitative analysis finds non-academic factors more likely to influence how papers get cited in SDG policy

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Addressing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires policymakers to utilise high-quality scholarly research effectively. This study explores the extent to which bibliometric indicators of research quality—field weighted citation index, journal CiteScore, author h-index and mentions—influence the likelihood of SDG-related research being cited in policy documents. Analysing metadata from over 16 million SDG-related articles revealed modest relationships between selected bibliometric indicators and policy citations. This suggests that bibliometric measures of research quality may not adequately explain policy influence, or that these metrics might not capture the essence of research excellence from a policy perspective. Importantly, the study identifies variations in research utilisation across different SDGs and highlights the potential role of non-academic factors in determining policy impact. Results provide a framework for understanding the extent to which policymakers are leveraging the best available evidence in their efforts to meet the SDGs.

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.