Algorithm Aversion: Investigating the Role of Confidence in AI-Assisted Judgment

As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly informs decision-making, understanding when and why individuals accept or reject algorithmic advice remains a critical issue. This study examines how individuals incorporate AI-generated advice into interpersonal judgments, an underexplored yet increasingly relevant domain for AI applications. Through an experimental study, we analyze the extent to which confidence in self-generated judgments moderates algorithm aversion. Specifically, we investigate whether individuals adjust their judgment of another person after receiving AI advice about that person's behavior and how their confidence shifts following the advice. Our findings suggest that algorithm aversion is strongly influenced by initial overconfidence rather than inherent distrust in AI. Furthermore, we find that receiving AI-generated advice can paradoxically decrease user confidence, highlighting potential risks of human vulnerability to AI influence in decision-making. These insights offer practical implications for organizations integrating AI into personnel evaluations, recruitment, and performance assessments, where interpersonal judgments play a crucial role.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithm Aversion: Investigating the Role of Confidence in AI-Assisted Judgment

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Algorithm Aversion: Investigating the Role of Confidence in AI-Assisted Judgment

article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly informs decision-making, understanding when and why individuals accept or reject algorithmic advice remains a critical issue. This study examines how individuals incorporate AI-generated advice into interpersonal judgments, an underexplored yet increasingly relevant domain for AI applications. Through an experimental study, we analyze the extent to which confidence in self-generated judgments moderates algorithm aversion. Specifically, we investigate whether individuals adjust their judgment of another person after receiving AI advice about that person's behavior and how their confidence shifts following the advice. Our findings suggest that algorithm aversion is strongly influenced by initial overconfidence rather than inherent distrust in AI. Furthermore, we find that receiving AI-generated advice can paradoxically decrease user confidence, highlighting potential risks of human vulnerability to AI influence in decision-making. These insights offer practical implications for organizations integrating AI into personnel evaluations, recruitment, and performance assessments, where interpersonal judgments play a crucial role.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Ivey Foundation (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.