What are “Wartime Authorities” and When Can the President Use Them? An Expert Q&A

The first several months of President Donald Trump’s second administration have been marred by the chaotic and often unlawful use, or threatened use, of wartime and terrorism-related authorities for what are essentially domestic immigration or criminal law enforcement purposes. This is not the first time a president has sought to push the boundaries of his wartime powers, or outright claimed those he did not have, but it may well be the most extreme. Indeed, Trump’s reliance on wartime authorities in contexts entirely divorced from armed conflict, or even the threat of force against the United States, puts the country on a novel and highly dangerous path. This is especially so given the extent to which he and his administration are demonizing and dehumanizing the people against whom they have aimed such powers. The language Trump is using has both political and legal aims; by using the rhetoric of war he seeks to legitimize his aggrandizement of power and his persecution of vulnerable populations.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-06-02
Primary Topic
Torture, Ethics, and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What are “Wartime Authorities” and When Can the President Use Them? An Expert Q&A

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Torture, Ethics, and Law
article

What are “Wartime Authorities” and When Can the President Use Them? An Expert Q&A

article en

Abstract

The first several months of President Donald Trump’s second administration have been marred by the chaotic and often unlawful use, or threatened use, of wartime and terrorism-related authorities for what are essentially domestic immigration or criminal law enforcement purposes. This is not the first time a president has sought to push the boundaries of his wartime powers, or outright claimed those he did not have, but it may well be the most extreme. Indeed, Trump’s reliance on wartime authorities in contexts entirely divorced from armed conflict, or even the threat of force against the United States, puts the country on a novel and highly dangerous path. This is especially so given the extent to which he and his administration are demonizing and dehumanizing the people against whom they have aimed such powers. The language Trump is using has both political and legal aims; by using the rhetoric of war he seeks to legitimize his aggrandizement of power and his persecution of vulnerable populations.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Torture, Ethics, and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.