Validation of Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening Knowledge Scale in a Diverse Population

Prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening, also known as non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), is widely recommended by American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) and The American College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (ACOG) as a first-line screening tool for all pregnant individuals. However, to ensure true informed decision-making, patients must have a clear understanding of the test’s scope, limitations, and implications. While tools such as the Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice (MMIC) aim to assess informed decision-making by incorporating knowledge, attitudes, and behavior, the knowledge component of the cfDNA screening MMIC has not yet been validated in a diverse population. This study aimed to establish face and content validity of an English prenatal cfDNA screening knowledge scale developed by the NSGC Research, Quality, and Outcomes (RQO) Committee. Ten English-speaking pregnant participants from diverse racial and educational backgrounds were recruited from clinical sites and social media platforms. Participants underwent cognitive interviews to assess understanding and relevance of the knowledge scale’s eight items. Interview responses were analyzed using a “traffic light” coding system to evaluate alignment with the intended meaning of the item. Findings demonstrated strong face and content validity, with all participant responses aligned with the intended meaning of the items. Additionally, all items were rated as either “important” or “helpful” for prenatal decision-making. Key revisions of the items included clarifying ambiguous terminology, such as replacing the words “negative” with “low risk” and “positive” with “high risk”, based on the participant feedback. This is the first study to successfully validate the cfDNA screening knowledge scale in a diverse population and highlights the potential of community-based recruitment strategies. The validated knowledge scale can be incorporated into an MMIC to support equitable, informed prenatal screening decisions to improve counseling outcomes across varied populations. Future research can explore the validation efforts in populations that include participants who identify as Black or African American and participants with non-university degrees.

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Commons-Sarah Lawrence (Sarah Lawrence College)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening Knowledge Scale in a Diverse Population

Digital Commons-Sarah Lawrence (Sarah Lawrence College)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Validation of Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening Knowledge Scale in a Diverse Population

article en

Abstract

Prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening, also known as non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), is widely recommended by American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) and The American College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (ACOG) as a first-line screening tool for all pregnant individuals. However, to ensure true informed decision-making, patients must have a clear understanding of the test’s scope, limitations, and implications. While tools such as the Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice (MMIC) aim to assess informed decision-making by incorporating knowledge, attitudes, and behavior, the knowledge component of the cfDNA screening MMIC has not yet been validated in a diverse population. This study aimed to establish face and content validity of an English prenatal cfDNA screening knowledge scale developed by the NSGC Research, Quality, and Outcomes (RQO) Committee. Ten English-speaking pregnant participants from diverse racial and educational backgrounds were recruited from clinical sites and social media platforms. Participants underwent cognitive interviews to assess understanding and relevance of the knowledge scale’s eight items. Interview responses were analyzed using a “traffic light” coding system to evaluate alignment with the intended meaning of the item. Findings demonstrated strong face and content validity, with all participant responses aligned with the intended meaning of the items. Additionally, all items were rated as either “important” or “helpful” for prenatal decision-making. Key revisions of the items included clarifying ambiguous terminology, such as replacing the words “negative” with “low risk” and “positive” with “high risk”, based on the participant feedback. This is the first study to successfully validate the cfDNA screening knowledge scale in a diverse population and highlights the potential of community-based recruitment strategies. The validated knowledge scale can be incorporated into an MMIC to support equitable, informed prenatal screening decisions to improve counseling outcomes across varied populations. Future research can explore the validation efforts in populations that include participants who identify as Black or African American and participants with non-university degrees.

Digital Commons-Sarah Lawrence (Sarah Lawrence College)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.