Stakeholder Perceptions of a New Learning Management System Implementation at a South African University

Learning Management Systems (LMSs) investments are increasing in response to internal and external factors such as technology and market trends, laws, and regulations. Many LMS implementation initiatives fail despite decades of research on IS success. Challenges faced by sub-Saharan Africa Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) LMS implementations are becoming context-specific to each institution. Studying implementation success quantitatively has however not provided adequate contextual insights into the complex dynamics of implementation. Research often investigates lecturers and students at the exclusion of other stakeholders. Using Critical Hermeneutics (CH) as a guiding perspective, semi-structured interviews were conducted with decision-makers, administrators, support staff, students, and lecturers at a South African HEI that had recently implemented a new LMS. Key findings indicate that technical support and the first-year migration were well-executed, however a number of stakeholder groups believed that the implementation was top-down and bureaucratic, whereas administrators felt excluded from the project. Meanwhile decision-makers commended the continued executive support. The discontent was indicative of a privileged access to discourse at the exclusion of academics, students and administrative voices and the progressive silencing of dissenting voices. This paper contributes to the literature on LMS implementation at HEI’s through using a qualitative critical perspective.

Publication Details

Journal
DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University)
Published
2024-09-12
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder Perceptions of a New Learning Management System Implementation at a South African University

DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University)
Online and Blended Learning
article

Stakeholder Perceptions of a New Learning Management System Implementation at a South African University

article en

Abstract

Learning Management Systems (LMSs) investments are increasing in response to internal and external factors such as technology and market trends, laws, and regulations. Many LMS implementation initiatives fail despite decades of research on IS success. Challenges faced by sub-Saharan Africa Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) LMS implementations are becoming context-specific to each institution. Studying implementation success quantitatively has however not provided adequate contextual insights into the complex dynamics of implementation. Research often investigates lecturers and students at the exclusion of other stakeholders. Using Critical Hermeneutics (CH) as a guiding perspective, semi-structured interviews were conducted with decision-makers, administrators, support staff, students, and lecturers at a South African HEI that had recently implemented a new LMS. Key findings indicate that technical support and the first-year migration were well-executed, however a number of stakeholder groups believed that the implementation was top-down and bureaucratic, whereas administrators felt excluded from the project. Meanwhile decision-makers commended the continued executive support. The discontent was indicative of a privileged access to discourse at the exclusion of academics, students and administrative voices and the progressive silencing of dissenting voices. This paper contributes to the literature on LMS implementation at HEI’s through using a qualitative critical perspective.

DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.