Rage Against the Muskine: Digital Luddism as Collective Action to Democratise Tech

Digital technologies are widely celebrated as engines of progress, but mounting evidence reveals they deepen inequities, erode democracies, and concentrate power among tech elites. Digital hegemonies shape public discourse, influence elections, and entrench corporate logic into essential societal infrastructures. These challenges require Information Systems (IS) scholarship to move beyond its historical focus on technology’s business value – a focus rooted in a techno-utilitarian narrative that views technological adoption as inherently progressive while sidelining societal harms. We reclaim Digital Luddism, traditionally dismissed as irrational resistance, as a legitimate response to digital hegemony through three strategies: Resistance blocks harmful technologies through activism and legal challenges; Removal dismantles entrenched systems through external intervention; and Replacement builds ethical alternatives prioritising social justice and human dignity. Our study bridges historical and contemporary Luddism, challenging techno-utilitarianism and advocating for a more inclusive, equitable, and diverse digital future.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rage Against the Muskine: Digital Luddism as Collective Action to Democratise Tech

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Social Media and Politics
article

Rage Against the Muskine: Digital Luddism as Collective Action to Democratise Tech

article en

Abstract

Digital technologies are widely celebrated as engines of progress, but mounting evidence reveals they deepen inequities, erode democracies, and concentrate power among tech elites. Digital hegemonies shape public discourse, influence elections, and entrench corporate logic into essential societal infrastructures. These challenges require Information Systems (IS) scholarship to move beyond its historical focus on technology’s business value – a focus rooted in a techno-utilitarian narrative that views technological adoption as inherently progressive while sidelining societal harms. We reclaim Digital Luddism, traditionally dismissed as irrational resistance, as a legitimate response to digital hegemony through three strategies: Resistance blocks harmful technologies through activism and legal challenges; Removal dismantles entrenched systems through external intervention; and Replacement builds ethical alternatives prioritising social justice and human dignity. Our study bridges historical and contemporary Luddism, challenging techno-utilitarianism and advocating for a more inclusive, equitable, and diverse digital future.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
The University of Sydney (AU), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rage Against the Muskine: Digital Luddism as Collective Action to Democratise Tech · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS