From Posts to Politics: The Relationship Between Social Media and Political Behavior and Attitudes

This study examines how social media usage predicts three key dimensions of U.S. political behavior and attitudes: affective polarization, trust in government, and voter turnout. Using post-COVID-19 data from the 2022 American National Election Studies (ANES) Social Media Study, the analysis evaluates whether greater social media engagement is associated with affective polarization, reduced trust in government, and voter turnout. Regression analyses reveal that while overall social media usage does not directly predict affective polarization, platform-specific effects emerge. TikTok engagement is associated with lower levels of affective polarization, while Reddit engagement correlates with intensified partisan hostility. Social media engagement does not significantly predict trust in government when examined as a whole, but platform-level variation indicates that TikTok use is associated with increased confidence in government institutions, while YouTube use corresponds with greater skepticism. Contrary to prior theories that suggest social media mobilizes voters, the study finds that greater social media engagement is linked to lower voter turnout, particularly among TikTok and YouTube users. By analyzing both aggregate and platform-specific effects, the research highlights the divergent ways social media is associated with political attitudes and behaviors. The findings contribute to the literature by addressing gaps related to newer social media platforms and post-pandemic political behavior, offering new insights into the complex relationship between digital engagement and democratic participation.

Publication Details

Journal
Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)
Published
2025-04-11
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Posts to Politics: The Relationship Between Social Media and Political Behavior and Attitudes

Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)
Social Media and Politics
article

From Posts to Politics: The Relationship Between Social Media and Political Behavior and Attitudes

article en

Abstract

This study examines how social media usage predicts three key dimensions of U.S. political behavior and attitudes: affective polarization, trust in government, and voter turnout. Using post-COVID-19 data from the 2022 American National Election Studies (ANES) Social Media Study, the analysis evaluates whether greater social media engagement is associated with affective polarization, reduced trust in government, and voter turnout. Regression analyses reveal that while overall social media usage does not directly predict affective polarization, platform-specific effects emerge. TikTok engagement is associated with lower levels of affective polarization, while Reddit engagement correlates with intensified partisan hostility. Social media engagement does not significantly predict trust in government when examined as a whole, but platform-level variation indicates that TikTok use is associated with increased confidence in government institutions, while YouTube use corresponds with greater skepticism. Contrary to prior theories that suggest social media mobilizes voters, the study finds that greater social media engagement is linked to lower voter turnout, particularly among TikTok and YouTube users. By analyzing both aggregate and platform-specific effects, the research highlights the divergent ways social media is associated with political attitudes and behaviors. The findings contribute to the literature by addressing gaps related to newer social media platforms and post-pandemic political behavior, offering new insights into the complex relationship between digital engagement and democratic participation.

Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.