The Paradoxical Impact of Generative AI on Agile Software Development Outcomes: A Process View

Emerging literature on Generative AI (GenAI) enabled software development outlines a paradox: although GenAI-driven automation speeds up coding tasks, its adoption inadvertently worsens project-level outcomes such as software throughput and stability. We take a process lens and examine how GenAI tools interact with agile practices and hypothesize that this paradox is the result of the vicious cycle of developing higher quantities of code that is more complex and less integrable with existing code, requiring more rework and refactoring effort by developers. We develop a system dynamics model to capture the feedback loops and causal mechanisms underlying GenAI use in agile software projects over time. We plan to collect quantitative project data and qualitative insights from software developers to refine and validate our model. Through this study, we aim to illuminate how GenAI can both elevate individual-level performance and still undercut performance of the agile project, offering theoretical and practical implications.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Paradoxical Impact of Generative AI on Agile Software Development Outcomes: A Process View

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
article

The Paradoxical Impact of Generative AI on Agile Software Development Outcomes: A Process View

article en

Abstract

Emerging literature on Generative AI (GenAI) enabled software development outlines a paradox: although GenAI-driven automation speeds up coding tasks, its adoption inadvertently worsens project-level outcomes such as software throughput and stability. We take a process lens and examine how GenAI tools interact with agile practices and hypothesize that this paradox is the result of the vicious cycle of developing higher quantities of code that is more complex and less integrable with existing code, requiring more rework and refactoring effort by developers. We develop a system dynamics model to capture the feedback loops and causal mechanisms underlying GenAI use in agile software projects over time. We plan to collect quantitative project data and qualitative insights from software developers to refine and validate our model. Through this study, we aim to illuminate how GenAI can both elevate individual-level performance and still undercut performance of the agile project, offering theoretical and practical implications.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Georgia State University (US)
Army Research Laboratory
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.