Methods

This entry introduces methods in International Relations (IR), generally considered a key dimension of social science research. It first defines what falls under the scope of ‘methods’ and the categories commonly used to organise this dimension of research: qualitative, quantitative, computational, participatory, research design and methodology. It then traces the historical development of methods in IR: from a descriptive field to the ‘classical’ versus ‘scientific’ approaches of the 1960s, to the positivist vs post-positivist debate of the 1990s, to the emergence of critical research methods since the 2000s. Third, it identifies two debates that currently structure the conversation about methods in IR. The conclusion sketches out three potential implications of and directions for the future of methods in IR: the relation between IR and other fields of study, quality and ethics of data and the adequacy to IR (or lack thereof) of methods imported from other disciplines.

Publication Details

Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Published
2025-03-13
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Methods

article en

Abstract

This entry introduces methods in International Relations (IR), generally considered a key dimension of social science research. It first defines what falls under the scope of ‘methods’ and the categories commonly used to organise this dimension of research: qualitative, quantitative, computational, participatory, research design and methodology. It then traces the historical development of methods in IR: from a descriptive field to the ‘classical’ versus ‘scientific’ approaches of the 1960s, to the positivist vs post-positivist debate of the 1990s, to the emergence of critical research methods since the 2000s. Third, it identifies two debates that currently structure the conversation about methods in IR. The conclusion sketches out three potential implications of and directions for the future of methods in IR: the relation between IR and other fields of study, quality and ethics of data and the adequacy to IR (or lack thereof) of methods imported from other disciplines.

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Methods · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS