Navigating Cooperation in Multiuser AI Systems: Procedural Justice, Explainable AI, and Social Dynamics

As Multiuser Artificial Intelligence Systems (MAIS) play an increasing role in the public sphere, user cooperation is crucial for their goal. Since the public sphere is diverse in users, interests, and features, a sociotechnical perspective is needed to examine the cooperation with the MAIS. Therefore, building on the Procedural Justice Theory, we propose two pathways for the user to perceive procedural justice. First, explainable AI (XAI) can support the perception of the procedural justice's pillars. Second is social identity, where users with strong community ties perceive fairness regardless of the explanation. Last, we hypothesize that XAI and the user’s social identity interact to affect cooperation. Through a scenario survey, we aim to explore how different types of XAI and user identifications affect users’ intention to cooperate with MAISs. Our findings can contribute to the XAI and justice literature and highlight how policymakers can design effective MAIS.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Cooperation in Multiuser AI Systems: Procedural Justice, Explainable AI, and Social Dynamics

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Navigating Cooperation in Multiuser AI Systems: Procedural Justice, Explainable AI, and Social Dynamics

article en

Abstract

As Multiuser Artificial Intelligence Systems (MAIS) play an increasing role in the public sphere, user cooperation is crucial for their goal. Since the public sphere is diverse in users, interests, and features, a sociotechnical perspective is needed to examine the cooperation with the MAIS. Therefore, building on the Procedural Justice Theory, we propose two pathways for the user to perceive procedural justice. First, explainable AI (XAI) can support the perception of the procedural justice's pillars. Second is social identity, where users with strong community ties perceive fairness regardless of the explanation. Last, we hypothesize that XAI and the user’s social identity interact to affect cooperation. Through a scenario survey, we aim to explore how different types of XAI and user identifications affect users’ intention to cooperate with MAISs. Our findings can contribute to the XAI and justice literature and highlight how policymakers can design effective MAIS.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Instituto de Saúde (BR)
Institute for Computing, Information and Cognitive Systems, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.