Neurosymbolic Cognitive Methods for Enhancing Foundation Model-based Reasoning

Foundation models have emerged as powerful tools, exhibiting extraordinary performance across various tasks, such as language processing, visual recognition, code generation, and human-centered engagement. However, recent studies have highlighted their limitations when grounded, abstract, and generalized reasoning capabilities are required. Complex tasks often involve multiple hierarchical reasoning steps, which are typical features of human thinking processes. In fact, in this chapter we claim that cognitively-inspired computational models, such as the so-called Common Model of Cognition, are key to enable complex reasoning within foundation model-based artificial intelligence (AI) systems. We investigate neurosymbolic approaches for mapping AI system components to those of the Common Model of Cognition, either fully or partially. Specifically, two pathways are explored: (i) Given a task and its solution, we explore the effect of fine-tuning foundation models on the output traces obtained through a cognitive architecture such as ACT-R. The hypothesis is that, after fine-tuning, the foundation model will more closely emulate the cognitive reasoning processes necessary to solve the specific task. (ii) In the second approach, given a task, we explore mapping the solution requirements to various components of the common model of cognition and invoke a combination of foundation model-based pattern recognition, external knowledge augmentation and control flow planning to facilitate cognitive reasoning for the task. The chapter covers the background of foundation models and the common model of cognition, a survey of the existing landscape in integrating foundation models and cognitive architectures, and a discussion of insights from preliminary implementations of the two neurosymbolic pathways across real-world and synthetic tasks.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
Published
2024-09-12
Primary Topic
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurosymbolic Cognitive Methods for Enhancing Foundation Model-based Reasoning

Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
article

Neurosymbolic Cognitive Methods for Enhancing Foundation Model-based Reasoning

article en

Abstract

Foundation models have emerged as powerful tools, exhibiting extraordinary performance across various tasks, such as language processing, visual recognition, code generation, and human-centered engagement. However, recent studies have highlighted their limitations when grounded, abstract, and generalized reasoning capabilities are required. Complex tasks often involve multiple hierarchical reasoning steps, which are typical features of human thinking processes. In fact, in this chapter we claim that cognitively-inspired computational models, such as the so-called Common Model of Cognition, are key to enable complex reasoning within foundation model-based artificial intelligence (AI) systems. We investigate neurosymbolic approaches for mapping AI system components to those of the Common Model of Cognition, either fully or partially. Specifically, two pathways are explored: (i) Given a task and its solution, we explore the effect of fine-tuning foundation models on the output traces obtained through a cognitive architecture such as ACT-R. The hypothesis is that, after fine-tuning, the foundation model will more closely emulate the cognitive reasoning processes necessary to solve the specific task. (ii) In the second approach, given a task, we explore mapping the solution requirements to various components of the common model of cognition and invoke a combination of foundation model-based pattern recognition, external knowledge augmentation and control flow planning to facilitate cognitive reasoning for the task. The chapter covers the background of foundation models and the common model of cognition, a survey of the existing landscape in integrating foundation models and cognitive architectures, and a discussion of insights from preliminary implementations of the two neurosymbolic pathways across real-world and synthetic tasks.

Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Neurosymbolic Cognitive Methods for Enhancing Foundation Model-based Reasoning · Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS