Length scale calibration for van der Meer
\nscans at the LHCb experiment

The van der Meer scan is one of the main methods used in high-energy physics experiments to calibrate the luminosity. This method is based on moving the particle beams in
\nprecise positions to determine the beam profiles and thus the absolute luminosity scale.
\nTo verify that these beam movements are indeed accurate, each van der Meer scan (vdM)
\ncomprises a particular procedure called length scale calibration (LSC).
\nThe following thesis presents the analysis of the data from three length scale calibration
\nprocedures, conducted at the LHCb experiment. The purpose of these procedures is
\nto check the consistency between the nominal beam displacements (∆xLHC , ∆yLHC ),
\nwith the effective beam displacements (∆xV ELO, ∆yV ELO). The compatibility of the two
\npositions can be verified by checking if the quantities Cx and Cy, defined as the ratio
\nbetween the measured and nominal beam displacement, minus one, are compatible with
\nzero. To measure the effective displacements two different techniques were used: the
\nconstant beam separation method and the beam-gas imaging method.
\nThe results obtained with the constant beam separation method are as follows:
\n• LSC 2022: Cx = −0.0141 ± 0.0005; Cy = −0.0057 ± 0.0007;
\n• First LSC 2023: Cx = −0.0396 ± 0.0015; Cy = −0.0407 ± 0.0019;
\n• Second LSC 2023: Cx = −0.0442 ± 0.0015; Cy = −0.0395 ± 0.0019.
\nThe results obtained with the beam-gas imaging method are as follows:
\n• LSC 2022:
\n– Beam 1: Cx = −0.010 ± 0.024; Cy = −0.020 ± 0.029;
\n– Beam 2: Cx = −0.002 ± 0.032; Cy = 0.013 ± 0.044;
\n• First LSC 2023:
\n– Beam 1: Cx = 0.004 ± 0.034; Cy = 0.003 ± 0.027;
\n– Beam 2: Cx = −0.003 ± 0.033; Cy = −0.004 ± 0.033;
\n• Second LSC 2023:
\n– Beam 1: Cx = −0.013 ± 0.032; Cy = −0.014 ± 0.027;
\n– Beam 2: Cx = 0.001 ± 0.031; Cy = 0.002 ± 0.034.
\nThese measurements will be complemented by a comprehensive evaluation of systematic
\nuncertainties and will serve as input for the LHCb vdM campaign.

Publication Details

Journal
AMS Degree Thesis (University of Bologna)
Published
2024-10-30
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Length scale calibration for van der Meer
\nscans at the LHCb experiment

AMS Degree Thesis (University of Bologna)
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
article

Length scale calibration for van der Meer
\nscans at the LHCb experiment

article en

Abstract

The van der Meer scan is one of the main methods used in high-energy physics experiments to calibrate the luminosity. This method is based on moving the particle beams in
\nprecise positions to determine the beam profiles and thus the absolute luminosity scale.
\nTo verify that these beam movements are indeed accurate, each van der Meer scan (vdM)
\ncomprises a particular procedure called length scale calibration (LSC).
\nThe following thesis presents the analysis of the data from three length scale calibration
\nprocedures, conducted at the LHCb experiment. The purpose of these procedures is
\nto check the consistency between the nominal beam displacements (∆xLHC , ∆yLHC ),
\nwith the effective beam displacements (∆xV ELO, ∆yV ELO). The compatibility of the two
\npositions can be verified by checking if the quantities Cx and Cy, defined as the ratio
\nbetween the measured and nominal beam displacement, minus one, are compatible with
\nzero. To measure the effective displacements two different techniques were used: the
\nconstant beam separation method and the beam-gas imaging method.
\nThe results obtained with the constant beam separation method are as follows:
\n• LSC 2022: Cx = −0.0141 ± 0.0005; Cy = −0.0057 ± 0.0007;
\n• First LSC 2023: Cx = −0.0396 ± 0.0015; Cy = −0.0407 ± 0.0019;
\n• Second LSC 2023: Cx = −0.0442 ± 0.0015; Cy = −0.0395 ± 0.0019.
\nThe results obtained with the beam-gas imaging method are as follows:
\n• LSC 2022:
\n– Beam 1: Cx = −0.010 ± 0.024; Cy = −0.020 ± 0.029;
\n– Beam 2: Cx = −0.002 ± 0.032; Cy = 0.013 ± 0.044;
\n• First LSC 2023:
\n– Beam 1: Cx = 0.004 ± 0.034; Cy = 0.003 ± 0.027;
\n– Beam 2: Cx = −0.003 ± 0.033; Cy = −0.004 ± 0.033;
\n• Second LSC 2023:
\n– Beam 1: Cx = −0.013 ± 0.032; Cy = −0.014 ± 0.027;
\n– Beam 2: Cx = 0.001 ± 0.031; Cy = 0.002 ± 0.034.
\nThese measurements will be complemented by a comprehensive evaluation of systematic
\nuncertainties and will serve as input for the LHCb vdM campaign.

AMS Degree Thesis (University of Bologna)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.