Level of Compliance with Spanish Guideline Recommendations in the Management of Asthma

Lorena Piñel Jimenez, Álvaro Martinez Mesa, Esther Sanchez Alvarez, Javier Lopez Garcia, Ana Aguilar Galvez, Nuria Reina Marfil, Belen Gómez Rodríguez, Eva Cabrera Cesar, Jose Luis Velasco Garrido Department of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, SpainCorrespondence: Eva Cabrera Cesar, Department of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Campus de Teatinos, S/N. 29010, Málaga, Spain, Tel +34 646905201, Email [email protected]: To describe the clinical management of asthmatic patients and the level of compliance with the Guía Española para el Manejo del Asma (GEMA, Spanish Guidelines for Asthma Management) in the influential al area of Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Málaga (Spain).Materials and Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional study in asthma patients from the Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital influential area, Málaga (Spain). Asthma Control Test (ACT) results, demographic and clinical characteristics, and GEMA indicators of quality asthma care were obtained from each participating patient.Results: Two hundred and eighty-eight patients (64.2% woman, mean age 48.6 years) were included in the study. The evaluation of the level of compliance with the GEMA quality indicators showed that in 20.8% of the patients the diagnosis of asthma was confirmed by spirometry and bronchodilator test, and 52.5% of the patients with suspicion of allergic asthma performed a sensitization test. Among the smoker patients, 76.3% were recommended to stop smoking; 14.2% of the patients received a paper-based educational plan. Regarding asthma treatment, 92.3% of patients with persistent asthma received inhaled glucocorticoids (IGC). IGC and LABA were the most common treatments for asthma, used in combination (ICG + LABA) in 139 (48.3%) patients; 32.6% discontinued SABA treatment during the study period. Asthma was well controlled in 54.9% of the patients (ACT score ≥ 20), and 13.9% of the patients registered exacerbations during the previous year with a mean (SD) of 1.38 (0.74) events.Conclusion: Most of the GEMA quality indicators of asthma care are not followed in real-world clinical practice. Specialists select the best option among the available treatments but there is an unmet need for training plans in other relevant aspects, such as diagnosis and/or disease monitoring.Keywords: asthma, asthma control, indicators of quality care, clinical guidelines, asthma management, compliance with guidelines