Learning to Let Go: Weeding for Sustainability in a Mature Repository

Weeding isn’t just for print collections. As repositories mature, organizational complexity can creep in and collections become orphaned, irrelevant, or embarrassing to stakeholders or the host institution. Eleven years after launching our Digital Commons-based repository, Georgia Southern Commons, the University Libraries at Georgia Southern University have embarked on a wide-ranging audit of over 1,900 collection and community structures and over 150,000 items. This project has been complicated by the fact that Digital Commons provides no direct means of visualizing collection and community hierarchies or how records are collected across structures. During this session, presenters will share how we’ve overcome these limitations to understand the structure and content of these collections so that we can weed content we no longer wish to support, as well as simplify the organizational structure of the repository overall. While letting go can be hard to do, the long-term sustainability of repositories may depend on learning how.

Publication Details

Journal
Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi)
Published
2025-04-25
Primary Topic
Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning to Let Go: Weeding for Sustainability in a Mature Repository

Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi)
Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
article

Learning to Let Go: Weeding for Sustainability in a Mature Repository

article en

Abstract

Weeding isn’t just for print collections. As repositories mature, organizational complexity can creep in and collections become orphaned, irrelevant, or embarrassing to stakeholders or the host institution. Eleven years after launching our Digital Commons-based repository, Georgia Southern Commons, the University Libraries at Georgia Southern University have embarked on a wide-ranging audit of over 1,900 collection and community structures and over 150,000 items. This project has been complicated by the fact that Digital Commons provides no direct means of visualizing collection and community hierarchies or how records are collected across structures. During this session, presenters will share how we’ve overcome these limitations to understand the structure and content of these collections so that we can weed content we no longer wish to support, as well as simplify the organizational structure of the repository overall. While letting go can be hard to do, the long-term sustainability of repositories may depend on learning how.

Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.