Incipit Vita Nova: Philosophical Renewal through the journals of the New Generation (1917-1930)

In Argentine philosophical studies, the self-designated anti-positivist reaction played a key role in the professionalization of the field. Within the context of the University Reform, the task of discovering philosophy largely entailed distinguishing it from the sciences—and little more than that. The "new generation" thus advocated for a radical philosophical break that, in itself, was seen as capable of fostering significant theoretical developments, even while exposing a lack of concrete coordinates to define its own concerns. Nonetheless, this process involved a strong politicization of the field. Challenging the positivist consensus also meant confronting a liberal framework that was regarded as hegemonic. From 1917 onward, students and graduates engaged in philosophy promoted journals that offered political, historical, and theoretical interventions. While their philosophical affiliations were heterogeneous, these fragmented platforms of dissemination provide the material upon which to trace the evolution of philosophical interests and their developments.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Argentine historical studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incipit Vita Nova: Philosophical Renewal through the journals of the New Generation (1917-1930)

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Argentine historical studies
article

Incipit Vita Nova: Philosophical Renewal through the journals of the New Generation (1917-1930)

article en

Abstract

In Argentine philosophical studies, the self-designated anti-positivist reaction played a key role in the professionalization of the field. Within the context of the University Reform, the task of discovering philosophy largely entailed distinguishing it from the sciences—and little more than that. The "new generation" thus advocated for a radical philosophical break that, in itself, was seen as capable of fostering significant theoretical developments, even while exposing a lack of concrete coordinates to define its own concerns. Nonetheless, this process involved a strong politicization of the field. Challenging the positivist consensus also meant confronting a liberal framework that was regarded as hegemonic. From 1917 onward, students and graduates engaged in philosophy promoted journals that offered political, historical, and theoretical interventions. While their philosophical affiliations were heterogeneous, these fragmented platforms of dissemination provide the material upon which to trace the evolution of philosophical interests and their developments.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Argentine historical studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.