The Impact of U.S. Air Force Close Air Support of the Army on Joint Doctrine and the Battlefield 1943 - 2003

In American military historiography, the primary focus has often been on strategic bombing, large-scale infantry and armor maneuvers, asymmetrical warfare, the horrors of war, and the romanticized imagery of air-to-air combat. Historians rarely decide to delve into the impact of a specific type of mission and its evolution over time within the broader context of American wars throughout the 20th and early 21st Centuries. However, in an era of rapid technological and doctrinal changes, it is essential for historians to explore which specific missions have had the most significant impact on American military operations. One of the most impactful missions performed by the USAF also happens to be the most understudied and undercelebrated. Close air support (CAS) has been crucial in every American war since WWII. Specifically, large-scale close air support supplied to the United States Army by the Air Force has helped create a unique American-style blitzkrieg, it has saved countless American lives in defense and ambush protection, and it has tied together the services to create a joint fighting structure. Despite its substantial battlefield impact, CAS's significance has often been understated. This research examines the role of CAS in the WWII European Theatre of Operations, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Desert Storm, and the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, highlighting its effects on the battlefield and joint doctrinal relationships. The challenges and debates surrounding CAS also shed light on the political dynamics within the DoD and reveal the internal conflicts that hinder the potential effectiveness of the American military. This research argues that, although often overlooked by historians, post-war analysts, and after-action reports, CAS has always been a core mission of the USAF and has profoundly influenced American warfare.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Published
2024-09-19
Primary Topic
Military and Defense Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of U.S. Air Force Close Air Support of the Army on Joint Doctrine and the Battlefield 1943 - 2003

Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Military and Defense Studies
article

The Impact of U.S. Air Force Close Air Support of the Army on Joint Doctrine and the Battlefield 1943 - 2003

article en

Abstract

In American military historiography, the primary focus has often been on strategic bombing, large-scale infantry and armor maneuvers, asymmetrical warfare, the horrors of war, and the romanticized imagery of air-to-air combat. Historians rarely decide to delve into the impact of a specific type of mission and its evolution over time within the broader context of American wars throughout the 20th and early 21st Centuries. However, in an era of rapid technological and doctrinal changes, it is essential for historians to explore which specific missions have had the most significant impact on American military operations. One of the most impactful missions performed by the USAF also happens to be the most understudied and undercelebrated. Close air support (CAS) has been crucial in every American war since WWII. Specifically, large-scale close air support supplied to the United States Army by the Air Force has helped create a unique American-style blitzkrieg, it has saved countless American lives in defense and ambush protection, and it has tied together the services to create a joint fighting structure. Despite its substantial battlefield impact, CAS's significance has often been understated. This research examines the role of CAS in the WWII European Theatre of Operations, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Desert Storm, and the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, highlighting its effects on the battlefield and joint doctrinal relationships. The challenges and debates surrounding CAS also shed light on the political dynamics within the DoD and reveal the internal conflicts that hinder the potential effectiveness of the American military. This research argues that, although often overlooked by historians, post-war analysts, and after-action reports, CAS has always been a core mission of the USAF and has profoundly influenced American warfare.

Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Military and Defense Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.