HUMAN METACOGNITION IN AI-ASSISTED DECISION- MAKING

Artificial Intelligence (AI) fundamentally transforms decision-making. Its increasing accessibility and growing capabilities make it more and more feasible for humans to seek guidance in both professional and personal contexts. However, the responsibility to accept or reject AI recommendations ultimately rests with the human user, a process that relies heavily on metacognitive skills. Despite the growing integration of AI into decision-making processes, evidence on its effects on human cognition, especially metacognitive processes, remains limited. We assume that AI assistance reduces users’ metacognitive monitoring during decision-making, fostering overconfidence in AI capabilities and impairing metacognitive oversight in subsequent decisions that do not depend on AI. Through an experimental approach, we investigate how human-AI collaboration affects metacognition, with the goal of informing responsible use and design in AI systems to uphold human agency in decision-making.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-06-18
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HUMAN METACOGNITION IN AI-ASSISTED DECISION- MAKING

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

HUMAN METACOGNITION IN AI-ASSISTED DECISION- MAKING

article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) fundamentally transforms decision-making. Its increasing accessibility and growing capabilities make it more and more feasible for humans to seek guidance in both professional and personal contexts. However, the responsibility to accept or reject AI recommendations ultimately rests with the human user, a process that relies heavily on metacognitive skills. Despite the growing integration of AI into decision-making processes, evidence on its effects on human cognition, especially metacognitive processes, remains limited. We assume that AI assistance reduces users’ metacognitive monitoring during decision-making, fostering overconfidence in AI capabilities and impairing metacognitive oversight in subsequent decisions that do not depend on AI. Through an experimental approach, we investigate how human-AI collaboration affects metacognition, with the goal of informing responsible use and design in AI systems to uphold human agency in decision-making.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.