Exploring Instructors' Views on Fine-Tuned Generative AI Feedback in Higher Education

This paper explores the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) feedback into higher education. Specifically, it examines the views of 11 experienced instructors on fine-tuned GenAI formative feedback of student works in an online graduate program in the United States. The participants assessed sample GenAI reviews, and their perspectives were recorded through a numerical questionnaire and an open-ended survey. The findings revealed positive views overall, pervasive across the AI feedback. Numerical survey results showed that the feedback was generally deemed relevant, clear, actionable, useful, and comprehensive. Open-ended responses supported these findings, suggesting that GenAI feedback aligned well with course rubrics and provided actionable suggestions. Nevertheless, some limitations were identified, such as redundancy and lengthy suggestions that could overwhelm students. The study concludes with suggestions for the improvement of fine-tuned GenAI feedback to improve its effectiveness and enhance higher education students’ learning experiences, especially in online settings.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Published
2024-12-30
Primary Topic
Historical and Political Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Instructors' Views on Fine-Tuned Generative AI Feedback in Higher Education

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Historical and Political Studies
article

Exploring Instructors' Views on Fine-Tuned Generative AI Feedback in Higher Education

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) feedback into higher education. Specifically, it examines the views of 11 experienced instructors on fine-tuned GenAI formative feedback of student works in an online graduate program in the United States. The participants assessed sample GenAI reviews, and their perspectives were recorded through a numerical questionnaire and an open-ended survey. The findings revealed positive views overall, pervasive across the AI feedback. Numerical survey results showed that the feedback was generally deemed relevant, clear, actionable, useful, and comprehensive. Open-ended responses supported these findings, suggesting that GenAI feedback aligned well with course rubrics and provided actionable suggestions. Nevertheless, some limitations were identified, such as redundancy and lengthy suggestions that could overwhelm students. The study concludes with suggestions for the improvement of fine-tuned GenAI feedback to improve its effectiveness and enhance higher education students’ learning experiences, especially in online settings.

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Historical and Political Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.