Evaluating the Preclinical Curriculum for Women’s Health Content and Clinical Preparedness at Wayne State University School of Medicine

Introduction: We evaluated the preclinical curriculum at WSU SOM to determine if there is sufficient coverage of women's health topics and its impact on students’ clinical preparedness. We hypothesized that students perceive inadequate coverage across multiple women’s health disciplines, leading to low clinical preparedness. Knowledge from this study can guide recommended changes to the curriculum. Methods: A Qualtrics survey was distributed to the classes of 2024, 2025, and 2026, collecting feedback on women’s health topic coverage, and self-rated comfort with addressing these topics clinically. Results: Students reported that HDF provided the most comprehensive coverage, except for preventive health, which was attributed mainly to Clinical Skills. Cardiovascular health in women was the least covered, while psychiatric health received attention across multiple courses. Only 15% of respondents felt "extremely comfortable" with any women’s health topic. Cardiovascular and maternal/infant health had the highest “extremely uncomfortable” responses. Overall, 49% of students were dissatisfied with the women’s health content, with specific gaps in abortion care, contraception, and the physiology and medical management of female sexual pleasure. Discussion: The survey findings reveal that most students are dissatisfied with the women’s health content in WSUSOM’s preclinical curriculum. Our study was limited by responses predominantly coming from students identifying as women, as well as students pursuing specialties like OB/GYN or Internal Medicine, which may skew perceptions toward a greater need for women’s health content. Additionally, students’ clinical comfort might be affected by prior experiences, such as work in healthcare or completing an OB/GYN rotation before responding to the survey. Overall, the findings suggest that targeted curriculum changes could improve students' confidence and preparedness for clinical practice specific to women’s health.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Biology
Published
2025-04-04
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Preclinical Curriculum for Women’s Health Content and Clinical Preparedness at Wayne State University School of Medicine

Human Biology
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Evaluating the Preclinical Curriculum for Women’s Health Content and Clinical Preparedness at Wayne State University School of Medicine

article en

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluated the preclinical curriculum at WSU SOM to determine if there is sufficient coverage of women's health topics and its impact on students’ clinical preparedness. We hypothesized that students perceive inadequate coverage across multiple women’s health disciplines, leading to low clinical preparedness. Knowledge from this study can guide recommended changes to the curriculum. Methods: A Qualtrics survey was distributed to the classes of 2024, 2025, and 2026, collecting feedback on women’s health topic coverage, and self-rated comfort with addressing these topics clinically. Results: Students reported that HDF provided the most comprehensive coverage, except for preventive health, which was attributed mainly to Clinical Skills. Cardiovascular health in women was the least covered, while psychiatric health received attention across multiple courses. Only 15% of respondents felt "extremely comfortable" with any women’s health topic. Cardiovascular and maternal/infant health had the highest “extremely uncomfortable” responses. Overall, 49% of students were dissatisfied with the women’s health content, with specific gaps in abortion care, contraception, and the physiology and medical management of female sexual pleasure. Discussion: The survey findings reveal that most students are dissatisfied with the women’s health content in WSUSOM’s preclinical curriculum. Our study was limited by responses predominantly coming from students identifying as women, as well as students pursuing specialties like OB/GYN or Internal Medicine, which may skew perceptions toward a greater need for women’s health content. Additionally, students’ clinical comfort might be affected by prior experiences, such as work in healthcare or completing an OB/GYN rotation before responding to the survey. Overall, the findings suggest that targeted curriculum changes could improve students' confidence and preparedness for clinical practice specific to women’s health.

Human Biology
Wayne State College (US), Wayne State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.