Ensuring human agency: an interaction design pathway to AI augmentation

The augmentation of human work through Artificial Intelligence (AI) promises to be a panacea to the role of technology in organizations. While frameworks on augmentation theorize how to best divide work between humans and AI, the empirical literature on human-AI interaction offers unexpected and inconclusive findings. Interaction challenges—including overreliance and selected engagement with the algorithmic output—call into question how theorized augmentation benefits can be realized. Rooted in cognitive learning theory, this study’s conceptual model argues that human-AI interaction can lead to multiple beneficial outcomes when algorithmic output is designed in a reciprocal manner. By providing humans with reflection-provoking feedback, reciprocal algorithmic output does not prescribe any actions, and thereby necessitates humans to expend cognitive effort. Reciprocal algorithmic output enables three crucial augmentation outcomes: task performance, human agency, and human learning.

Publication Details

Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ensuring human agency: an interaction design pathway to AI augmentation

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Ensuring human agency: an interaction design pathway to AI augmentation

article en

Abstract

The augmentation of human work through Artificial Intelligence (AI) promises to be a panacea to the role of technology in organizations. While frameworks on augmentation theorize how to best divide work between humans and AI, the empirical literature on human-AI interaction offers unexpected and inconclusive findings. Interaction challenges—including overreliance and selected engagement with the algorithmic output—call into question how theorized augmentation benefits can be realized. Rooted in cognitive learning theory, this study’s conceptual model argues that human-AI interaction can lead to multiple beneficial outcomes when algorithmic output is designed in a reciprocal manner. By providing humans with reflection-provoking feedback, reciprocal algorithmic output does not prescribe any actions, and thereby necessitates humans to expend cognitive effort. Reciprocal algorithmic output enables three crucial augmentation outcomes: task performance, human agency, and human learning.

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.