Do Hands-On or Hands-Off Drivers Perform Better During a Level-2 Silent Failure?

In a driving context, a silent failure (SF) occurs when the automated vehicle system is not able to operate but does not recognise its reduced capacity. As a result, it does not request human intervention or alert the user to the failure; the human driver must therefore recognise the need for their input and provide it in an appropriate and timely manner. Recent legislation is beginning to relax the stipulation for drivers to keep their ‘hands-on’ the steering wheel during level 2 (L2) automation. This study therefore explores if and how hand position (‘hands-on’ or ‘hands-off’) influences drivers’ reaction time and the quality of their intervention following a silent failure at L2 automation. Results show that ‘hands-on’ drivers were significantly quicker to respond to the SF, with the first steering input occurring in 3.7s, on average, amongst this cohort, compared to 8.5s for ‘hands-off’ drivers. Significantly, all ‘hands-on’ drivers provided an active control input before their vehicle drifted across the lane boundary.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Published
2025-04-28
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Hands-On or Hands-Off Drivers Perform Better During a Level-2 Silent Failure?

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Do Hands-On or Hands-Off Drivers Perform Better During a Level-2 Silent Failure?

article en

Abstract

In a driving context, a silent failure (SF) occurs when the automated vehicle system is not able to operate but does not recognise its reduced capacity. As a result, it does not request human intervention or alert the user to the failure; the human driver must therefore recognise the need for their input and provide it in an appropriate and timely manner. Recent legislation is beginning to relax the stipulation for drivers to keep their ‘hands-on’ the steering wheel during level 2 (L2) automation. This study therefore explores if and how hand position (‘hands-on’ or ‘hands-off’) influences drivers’ reaction time and the quality of their intervention following a silent failure at L2 automation. Results show that ‘hands-on’ drivers were significantly quicker to respond to the SF, with the first steering input occurring in 3.7s, on average, amongst this cohort, compared to 8.5s for ‘hands-off’ drivers. Significantly, all ‘hands-on’ drivers provided an active control input before their vehicle drifted across the lane boundary.

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.