Diet Predicts Mind and Moral Concern Towards a Broad Range of Animal Categories

A compelling body of research demonstrates that diet (eg vegetarianism) plays an important role in the moral concern people grant to animals. However, this research has focused mostly on ‘food’animals, leaving us with limited understanding of the scope of this effect. We investigated how vegans/vegetarians (veg* ns) and omnivores attribute mind (Study 1) and moral standing (Study 2) across a wide range of animal categories. In Study 1, veg* ns perceived greater mental capacities for most animal categories. Both veg* ns and omnivores gave some categories lesser ratings than others (eg evolutionarily distant vs. close to humans), suggesting that veg* ns and omnivores follow similar patterns of mind perception. In Study 2, however, veg* ns both attributed animals greater moral standing overall and gave similar ratings across categories (eg toward ‘liked’animals such as rabbits and ‘disliked’animals such as rats), whereas omnivores drew sharper distinctions between categories. These studies demonstrate that meat avoidance is a meaningful factor not only in the perceptions of animals that people eat, but also other animals.

Publication Details

Journal
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Published
2024-12-17
Primary Topic
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diet Predicts Mind and Moral Concern Towards a Broad Range of Animal Categories

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
article

Diet Predicts Mind and Moral Concern Towards a Broad Range of Animal Categories

article en

Abstract

A compelling body of research demonstrates that diet (eg vegetarianism) plays an important role in the moral concern people grant to animals. However, this research has focused mostly on ‘food’animals, leaving us with limited understanding of the scope of this effect. We investigated how vegans/vegetarians (veg* ns) and omnivores attribute mind (Study 1) and moral standing (Study 2) across a wide range of animal categories. In Study 1, veg* ns perceived greater mental capacities for most animal categories. Both veg* ns and omnivores gave some categories lesser ratings than others (eg evolutionarily distant vs. close to humans), suggesting that veg* ns and omnivores follow similar patterns of mind perception. In Study 2, however, veg* ns both attributed animals greater moral standing overall and gave similar ratings across categories (eg toward ‘liked’animals such as rabbits and ‘disliked’animals such as rats), whereas omnivores drew sharper distinctions between categories. These studies demonstrate that meat avoidance is a meaningful factor not only in the perceptions of animals that people eat, but also other animals.

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.