DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE SURROGATE DECISION-MAKER TRUST SCALE

Surrogate decision-makers (SDM) of incapacitated patients in the adult ICU setting serve a vital role in making healthcare decisions for critically ill patients. However, these SDMs may suffer negative physical and emotional outcomes from carrying the burden of this responsibility. High-quality communication between the healthcare team and the SDM may mitigate some of the negative effects of decision-making on SDMs, but a prerequisite to this type of communication is SDM trust in healthcare professionals (HCPs). In order to develop interventions to increase trust and improve SDM outcomes, trust must be quantifiable, but there is currently no validated instrument with which to measure SDM trust in HCPs. Chapter 2: “A Concept Analysis of Trust Within the Surrogate Decision Maker to Health Care Professional Relationship in the Adult ICU Setting,” provides a newly developed conceptual definition of SDM trust in HCPs. This chapter also discusses antecedents of trust, those realities that must be present prior to the existence of trust, and consequences of trust, both positive and negative. Empirical referents that provide evidence of the presence of SDM trust in HCPs are also examined. Chapter 3: “A Scoping Review of Surrogate Decision-Maker Trust in Healthcare Professionals in the Adult ICU Setting,” describes a literature review to identify and map what is known about SDM trust in HCPs in this setting. The results of the review were mapped to a conceptual model to help organize and interpret the findings. Trust-building interventions and trust-related outcomes were identified. This review confirmed a significant gap in the literature due to the absence of a validated instrument with which to measure SDM trust in HCPs in the adult ICU setting. Chapter 4: “Development and Validation of the Surrogate Decision-Maker Trust Scale,” reports on a research study to create an instrument to measure SDM trust in HCPs in the adult ICU setting. Forty-five initial items were written based on the literature review presented in chapter 3. This item bank was refined through content validity testing and regularized exploratory factor analysis down to a final list of 22 questions that made up the Surrogate Decision-Maker Trust Scale (SDMTS). Chapter 5 summarizes the previous chapters and suggests next steps to build on this dissertation research. The practical implications of this research for nursing practice, education, and future research are examined. Recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and further validity testing are given.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholar Works at UT Tyler (The University of Texas at Tyler)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE SURROGATE DECISION-MAKER TRUST SCALE

Scholar Works at UT Tyler (The University of Texas at Tyler)
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE SURROGATE DECISION-MAKER TRUST SCALE

article en

Abstract

Surrogate decision-makers (SDM) of incapacitated patients in the adult ICU setting serve a vital role in making healthcare decisions for critically ill patients. However, these SDMs may suffer negative physical and emotional outcomes from carrying the burden of this responsibility. High-quality communication between the healthcare team and the SDM may mitigate some of the negative effects of decision-making on SDMs, but a prerequisite to this type of communication is SDM trust in healthcare professionals (HCPs). In order to develop interventions to increase trust and improve SDM outcomes, trust must be quantifiable, but there is currently no validated instrument with which to measure SDM trust in HCPs. Chapter 2: “A Concept Analysis of Trust Within the Surrogate Decision Maker to Health Care Professional Relationship in the Adult ICU Setting,” provides a newly developed conceptual definition of SDM trust in HCPs. This chapter also discusses antecedents of trust, those realities that must be present prior to the existence of trust, and consequences of trust, both positive and negative. Empirical referents that provide evidence of the presence of SDM trust in HCPs are also examined. Chapter 3: “A Scoping Review of Surrogate Decision-Maker Trust in Healthcare Professionals in the Adult ICU Setting,” describes a literature review to identify and map what is known about SDM trust in HCPs in this setting. The results of the review were mapped to a conceptual model to help organize and interpret the findings. Trust-building interventions and trust-related outcomes were identified. This review confirmed a significant gap in the literature due to the absence of a validated instrument with which to measure SDM trust in HCPs in the adult ICU setting. Chapter 4: “Development and Validation of the Surrogate Decision-Maker Trust Scale,” reports on a research study to create an instrument to measure SDM trust in HCPs in the adult ICU setting. Forty-five initial items were written based on the literature review presented in chapter 3. This item bank was refined through content validity testing and regularized exploratory factor analysis down to a final list of 22 questions that made up the Surrogate Decision-Maker Trust Scale (SDMTS). Chapter 5 summarizes the previous chapters and suggests next steps to build on this dissertation research. The practical implications of this research for nursing practice, education, and future research are examined. Recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and further validity testing are given.

Scholar Works at UT Tyler (The University of Texas at Tyler)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE SURROGATE DECISION-MAKER TRUST SCALE · Scholar Works at UT Tyler (The University of Texas at Tyler) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS