Defense of Indigents in Maine: The Need for Public Defenders

During the past ten years the United States Supreme Court has engineered a major reworking of criminal procedure through judicial review. In no area of criminal procedure has the overhaul been so drastic as in the right to court appointed counsel. From a time when court appointment of counsel was virtually nonexistent, the right has been expanded to the extent that counsel is now available in nearly all cases and stages of the proceedings. This rapid growth of the right to counsel has placed an understandable strain on state and federal judicial systems. Various means of coping with the demands have been devised, though most have been short-sighted and ill-suited to the needs of both state and defendant. The State of Maine has felt these pressures on its judicial system and has responded in piecemeal fashion, resulting in a makeshift system for the provision of defense services. In this article the legal developments in the area of right to counsel will be outlined to assay the dimensions of the crisis. The present system for providing defender services will be examined with reference to a survey taken of the practices and opinions of superior and district court judges in appointment of counsel. Finally, the advantages of a public defender system will be presented in general form, followed by a specific proposal for legislation creating a public defender system for Maine.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-05-07
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defense of Indigents in Maine: The Need for Public Defenders

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

Defense of Indigents in Maine: The Need for Public Defenders

article en

Abstract

During the past ten years the United States Supreme Court has engineered a major reworking of criminal procedure through judicial review. In no area of criminal procedure has the overhaul been so drastic as in the right to court appointed counsel. From a time when court appointment of counsel was virtually nonexistent, the right has been expanded to the extent that counsel is now available in nearly all cases and stages of the proceedings. This rapid growth of the right to counsel has placed an understandable strain on state and federal judicial systems. Various means of coping with the demands have been devised, though most have been short-sighted and ill-suited to the needs of both state and defendant. The State of Maine has felt these pressures on its judicial system and has responded in piecemeal fashion, resulting in a makeshift system for the provision of defense services. In this article the legal developments in the area of right to counsel will be outlined to assay the dimensions of the crisis. The present system for providing defender services will be examined with reference to a survey taken of the practices and opinions of superior and district court judges in appointment of counsel. Finally, the advantages of a public defender system will be presented in general form, followed by a specific proposal for legislation creating a public defender system for Maine.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defense of Indigents in Maine: The Need for Public Defenders · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS