Clinical Outcomes of an Enhanced and Conventional Monofocal IOL in Patients with Early and Intermediate Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Jan A Venter,1 Colin W Berry,1 Noelle C Hannan,1 Dasi Raju,1 Huba J Kiss,1 Mirna Belovari,1 Stephen J Hannan,1 David R Cooper,1 Julie M Schallhorn2,3 1Optical Express, Glasgow, UK; 2Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; 3F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USACorrespondence: Jan A Venter, Optical Express, 200 St Vincent St, Glasgow, G2 5SG, UK, Email [email protected]: To compare the performance of an enhanced and conventional monofocal IOL in eyes with early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD).Methods: This retrospective study compared one-month postoperative outcomes of patients bilaterally implanted with TECNIS Eyhance IOL (ICB00 group) or TECNIS Monofocal IOL (ZCB00 group). All patients underwent cataract surgery with pre-existing early or intermediate dry AMD. Outcome measures were monocular and binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA) and near (UNVA) visual acuity, monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and refractive outcomes. Monocular visual acuities and refractive predictability were calculated for the dominant eye of each patient.Results: The ICB00 group comprised 143 eyes of 143 patients, while 164 eyes of 164 patients were included in the ZCB00 group. Preoperative characteristics were comparable between the two groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative refractive predictability, with 87.4% and 89.6% of eyes within 0.50 D of emmetropia in the ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively (p=0.54). No difference was found in postoperative UDVA or CDVA between the groups. Both monocular and binocular UIVA were significantly better in the ICB00 group (monocular UIVA: 0.32± 0.19 vs 0.42± 0.22 logMAR, p< 0.001; binocular UIVA: 0.25± 0.18 vs 0.36± 0.17 logMAR, p< 0.001). Postoperative UNVA was also better with the ICB00 IOL (monocular UNVA: 0.58± 0.16 vs 0.69± 0.20 logMAR, p< 0.001; binocular UNVA: 0.50± 0.16 vs 0.63± 0.17 logMAR, p< 0.001).Conclusion: ICB00 IOL enhanced intermediate and near vision in patients with AMD while achieving the same level of corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity.Keywords: enhanced monofocal IOL, age-related macular degeneration, intermediate vision

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcomes of an Enhanced and Conventional Monofocal IOL in Patients with Early and Intermediate Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Clinical Outcomes of an Enhanced and Conventional Monofocal IOL in Patients with Early and Intermediate Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration

article en

Abstract

Jan A Venter,1 Colin W Berry,1 Noelle C Hannan,1 Dasi Raju,1 Huba J Kiss,1 Mirna Belovari,1 Stephen J Hannan,1 David R Cooper,1 Julie M Schallhorn2,3 1Optical Express, Glasgow, UK; 2Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; 3F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USACorrespondence: Jan A Venter, Optical Express, 200 St Vincent St, Glasgow, G2 5SG, UK, Email [email protected]: To compare the performance of an enhanced and conventional monofocal IOL in eyes with early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD).Methods: This retrospective study compared one-month postoperative outcomes of patients bilaterally implanted with TECNIS Eyhance IOL (ICB00 group) or TECNIS Monofocal IOL (ZCB00 group). All patients underwent cataract surgery with pre-existing early or intermediate dry AMD. Outcome measures were monocular and binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA) and near (UNVA) visual acuity, monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and refractive outcomes. Monocular visual acuities and refractive predictability were calculated for the dominant eye of each patient.Results: The ICB00 group comprised 143 eyes of 143 patients, while 164 eyes of 164 patients were included in the ZCB00 group. Preoperative characteristics were comparable between the two groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative refractive predictability, with 87.4% and 89.6% of eyes within 0.50 D of emmetropia in the ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively (p=0.54). No difference was found in postoperative UDVA or CDVA between the groups. Both monocular and binocular UIVA were significantly better in the ICB00 group (monocular UIVA: 0.32± 0.19 vs 0.42± 0.22 logMAR, p< 0.001; binocular UIVA: 0.25± 0.18 vs 0.36± 0.17 logMAR, p< 0.001). Postoperative UNVA was also better with the ICB00 IOL (monocular UNVA: 0.58± 0.16 vs 0.69± 0.20 logMAR, p< 0.001; binocular UNVA: 0.50± 0.16 vs 0.63± 0.17 logMAR, p< 0.001).Conclusion: ICB00 IOL enhanced intermediate and near vision in patients with AMD while achieving the same level of corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity.Keywords: enhanced monofocal IOL, age-related macular degeneration, intermediate vision

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinical Outcomes of an Enhanced and Conventional Monofocal IOL in Patients with Early and Intermediate Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS