Comparative Analysis of Public Perception of Feminine Forms Denoting Professions in Russia and Spain

The article is dedicated to a comparative analysis of the perception and use of feminized forms by society in Russia and Spain. The author claims that the process of incorporating this linguistic phenomenon directly depends on the society and culture of each country. While both languages provide tools for modifying existing words or creating new ones, this does not guarantee their effective usage. The study focuses on survey results regarding the use of 20 feminine forms in Russian and 20 words in Spanish, involving 105 Russian-speaking and 105 Spanish-speaking participants. As a result, it is established that the Russian language and the Spanish language possess different mechanisms for the formation of feminine gender-specific job titles. The Russian language has a greater number of morphological resources capable of participating in the word formation of this lexical category compared to Spanish. The most effective methods are affixation, which has a wide range of word-forming suffixes, substantiation, and word compounding. In Spanish, the most productive method is the replacement of masculine endings with feminine endings. Despite the morphological limitations, Spanish society integrates this lexicon more swiftly into official discourse and promotes its usage at the national level through the distribution of special literature in public organizations, which is obligatory. In contrast, in Russia, despite progress in this area, the population remains more conservative, continuing to use masculine forms as gender-neutral.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
e-rph (University of Granada)
Published
2024-12-29
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Public Perception of Feminine Forms Denoting Professions in Russia and Spain

e-rph (University of Granada)
Gender Studies in Language
article

Comparative Analysis of Public Perception of Feminine Forms Denoting Professions in Russia and Spain

article en

Abstract

The article is dedicated to a comparative analysis of the perception and use of feminized forms by society in Russia and Spain. The author claims that the process of incorporating this linguistic phenomenon directly depends on the society and culture of each country. While both languages provide tools for modifying existing words or creating new ones, this does not guarantee their effective usage. The study focuses on survey results regarding the use of 20 feminine forms in Russian and 20 words in Spanish, involving 105 Russian-speaking and 105 Spanish-speaking participants. As a result, it is established that the Russian language and the Spanish language possess different mechanisms for the formation of feminine gender-specific job titles. The Russian language has a greater number of morphological resources capable of participating in the word formation of this lexical category compared to Spanish. The most effective methods are affixation, which has a wide range of word-forming suffixes, substantiation, and word compounding. In Spanish, the most productive method is the replacement of masculine endings with feminine endings. Despite the morphological limitations, Spanish society integrates this lexicon more swiftly into official discourse and promotes its usage at the national level through the distribution of special literature in public organizations, which is obligatory. In contrast, in Russia, despite progress in this area, the population remains more conservative, continuing to use masculine forms as gender-neutral.

e-rph (University of Granada)
Universidad de Granada (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.