Comparing the RSP Accuracy of Dual-Energy to Conventional Single-Energy CT for Potential Reduction of Clinical Safety Margins in Proton Therapy

In proton therapy, treatment planning is reliant on the accurate prediction of relative stopping power (RSP) to calculate the proton range necessary to sufficiently treat the target volume and minimize the dose given to healthy tissue and organs at risk. However, uncertainties resulting from approximations made in the calculation of RSP from CT numbers necessitates the use of 2.5%-3.5% range uncertainty margin. This study aimed to evaluate the potential reduction of this uncertainty margin using Dual-Energy CT (DECT) by comparing the RSP accuracy of an ultra-fast switching KV DECT to conventional Single- Energy CT (SECT). Reference RSP values of tissue-mimicking cylindrical plugs and fresh, postmortem lamb tissue were obtained using MLIC measurements and proton CT respectively. RSP values were then derived from DECT and SECT of both the tissue-mimicking plugs and the lamb tissue and their percentage difference from the reference RSP values was calculated. Overall, DECT demonstrated a lower mean absolute percentage error than SECT for all tissue types in both tissue mimicking phantoms and in animal tissue, potentially implying that the use of DECT could reduce uncertainty in treatment planning.

Publication Details

Journal
DigitalCommons-IMSA (Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy)
Published
2025-04-17
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the RSP Accuracy of Dual-Energy to Conventional Single-Energy CT for Potential Reduction of Clinical Safety Margins in Proton Therapy

DigitalCommons-IMSA (Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy)
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
article

Comparing the RSP Accuracy of Dual-Energy to Conventional Single-Energy CT for Potential Reduction of Clinical Safety Margins in Proton Therapy

article en

Abstract

In proton therapy, treatment planning is reliant on the accurate prediction of relative stopping power (RSP) to calculate the proton range necessary to sufficiently treat the target volume and minimize the dose given to healthy tissue and organs at risk. However, uncertainties resulting from approximations made in the calculation of RSP from CT numbers necessitates the use of 2.5%-3.5% range uncertainty margin. This study aimed to evaluate the potential reduction of this uncertainty margin using Dual-Energy CT (DECT) by comparing the RSP accuracy of an ultra-fast switching KV DECT to conventional Single- Energy CT (SECT). Reference RSP values of tissue-mimicking cylindrical plugs and fresh, postmortem lamb tissue were obtained using MLIC measurements and proton CT respectively. RSP values were then derived from DECT and SECT of both the tissue-mimicking plugs and the lamb tissue and their percentage difference from the reference RSP values was calculated. Overall, DECT demonstrated a lower mean absolute percentage error than SECT for all tissue types in both tissue mimicking phantoms and in animal tissue, potentially implying that the use of DECT could reduce uncertainty in treatment planning.

DigitalCommons-IMSA (Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy)
Good health and well-being, Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.