ChatGPT vs Google: Difference in AI-Enabled Iterative Generation

With novel AIGC characteristics, the emerging ChatGPT threatens Google’s online search market dominance. We plan to compare Google and ChatGPT as question answering systems (QASs), focusing on how AI-enabled iterative generation affects users’ perceived learning capability and predictability in a laboratory experiment. Specifically, we integrate three theoretical lenses: self-regulated learning theory, question answering systems (QASs), and information retrieval literature—to examine differences between Google and ChatGPT. Two new constructs are developed: AI- enabled iterative generation and perceived learning capability. Then we propose that AI-enabled iterative generation leads to better performance in all three dimensions of learning capability (i.e., elaboration, critical thinking, and self-regulation) while Google excels in perceived predictability. When QA tasks become more complex, the superiority of ChatGPT will be more prominent while Google’s strength will diminish. Overall, our expected results can provide significant implications for the new shape and direction of search services.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Expert finding and Q&A systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ChatGPT vs Google: Difference in AI-Enabled Iterative Generation

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Expert finding and Q&A systems
article

ChatGPT vs Google: Difference in AI-Enabled Iterative Generation

article en

Abstract

With novel AIGC characteristics, the emerging ChatGPT threatens Google’s online search market dominance. We plan to compare Google and ChatGPT as question answering systems (QASs), focusing on how AI-enabled iterative generation affects users’ perceived learning capability and predictability in a laboratory experiment. Specifically, we integrate three theoretical lenses: self-regulated learning theory, question answering systems (QASs), and information retrieval literature—to examine differences between Google and ChatGPT. Two new constructs are developed: AI- enabled iterative generation and perceived learning capability. Then we propose that AI-enabled iterative generation leads to better performance in all three dimensions of learning capability (i.e., elaboration, critical thinking, and self-regulation) while Google excels in perceived predictability. When QA tasks become more complex, the superiority of ChatGPT will be more prominent while Google’s strength will diminish. Overall, our expected results can provide significant implications for the new shape and direction of search services.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Expert finding and Q&A systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.