Brainstorming with a Generative Language Model: The Role of Creative Ability and Tool-Support for Brainstorming Performance

Generative language models (GLMs) are used for creative tasks such as brainstorming. While studies show GLMs’ creative potential, research on who benefits from support in creative tasks is inconclusive, and concerns are raised on whether humans reduce their effort when working with GLMs. Therefore, we explored how creative ability and GLM support affect the two brainstorming performance metrics fluency and originality. In our experiment with a GPT-4-based brainstorming app, we randomly assigned the 58 participants to one of two conditions: with or without GLM-support. Additionally, we split participants into a low- and a high-creativity group based on a creativity ability pre-test. Our findings reveal that low-creativity participants show increased fluency when being GLM-supported, while the effect on originality was positive for both groups. We contribute to the literature on human-GLM brainstorming and individual creativity support systems, offering a more nuanced perspective on GLMs’ (potentially undesired) effects on behavior and performance.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brainstorming with a Generative Language Model: The Role of Creative Ability and Tool-Support for Brainstorming Performance

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

Brainstorming with a Generative Language Model: The Role of Creative Ability and Tool-Support for Brainstorming Performance

article en

Abstract

Generative language models (GLMs) are used for creative tasks such as brainstorming. While studies show GLMs’ creative potential, research on who benefits from support in creative tasks is inconclusive, and concerns are raised on whether humans reduce their effort when working with GLMs. Therefore, we explored how creative ability and GLM support affect the two brainstorming performance metrics fluency and originality. In our experiment with a GPT-4-based brainstorming app, we randomly assigned the 58 participants to one of two conditions: with or without GLM-support. Additionally, we split participants into a low- and a high-creativity group based on a creativity ability pre-test. Our findings reveal that low-creativity participants show increased fluency when being GLM-supported, while the effect on originality was positive for both groups. We contribute to the literature on human-GLM brainstorming and individual creativity support systems, offering a more nuanced perspective on GLMs’ (potentially undesired) effects on behavior and performance.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Brainstorming with a Generative Language Model: The Role of Creative Ability and Tool-Support for Brainstorming Performance · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS