Beyond the Suburban Ideal: Addressing Southern California’s Strained Affordable Housing Market Through Density Bonus Programs

This study examines how expanding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) could serve as an effective policy solution to address the housing affordability crisis. In San Diego, a Bonus Program has been implemented to incentivize the construction of affordable ADUs by relaxing burdensome regulations. A Differences-in-Differences approach using two-way fixed effects is employed to evaluate the program's effectiveness in promoting ADU development, using city-level data from San Diego and Los Angeles counties. ADU permit applications serve as a key indicator of policy impact. The findings strongly suggest that the Bonus Program influenced increasing ADU permit applications in San Diego. Because the model violated the parallel trends assumption, causality cannot be inferred, only correlation. Two policy alternatives considered alongside the Bonus Program are Community Land Trusts (CLTs) and maintaining the status quo. CLTs acquire land and property to ensure long-term affordable housing, primarily benefiting homeowners. However, because California has a high proportion of renters, CLTs must adapt to include rental properties to effectively support both low-income renters and owners. The status quo is inadequate and will likely become more costly the longer the housing crisis persists. The ultimate recommendation is to continue evaluating the impacts of the San Diego Bonus Program and explore its potential for replication in similar cities. Additionally, integrating ADUs within Community Land Trust frameworks may offer a long-term solution that addresses the needs of both low-income renters and homeowners.

Publication Details

Journal
Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Suburban Ideal: Addressing Southern California’s Strained Affordable Housing Market Through Density Bonus Programs

Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
article

Beyond the Suburban Ideal: Addressing Southern California’s Strained Affordable Housing Market Through Density Bonus Programs

article en

Abstract

This study examines how expanding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) could serve as an effective policy solution to address the housing affordability crisis. In San Diego, a Bonus Program has been implemented to incentivize the construction of affordable ADUs by relaxing burdensome regulations. A Differences-in-Differences approach using two-way fixed effects is employed to evaluate the program's effectiveness in promoting ADU development, using city-level data from San Diego and Los Angeles counties. ADU permit applications serve as a key indicator of policy impact. The findings strongly suggest that the Bonus Program influenced increasing ADU permit applications in San Diego. Because the model violated the parallel trends assumption, causality cannot be inferred, only correlation. Two policy alternatives considered alongside the Bonus Program are Community Land Trusts (CLTs) and maintaining the status quo. CLTs acquire land and property to ensure long-term affordable housing, primarily benefiting homeowners. However, because California has a high proportion of renters, CLTs must adapt to include rental properties to effectively support both low-income renters and owners. The status quo is inadequate and will likely become more costly the longer the housing crisis persists. The ultimate recommendation is to continue evaluating the impacts of the San Diego Bonus Program and explore its potential for replication in similar cities. Additionally, integrating ADUs within Community Land Trust frameworks may offer a long-term solution that addresses the needs of both low-income renters and homeowners.

Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.