AI Governance in Large-Scale Organizations: Who is Responsible for What?

This paper examines the distribution of responsibility and accountability for AI governance in large-scale organizations. Despite the growing importance of AI governance, existing literature lacks clear guidance for the incorporation into organizational structures and role assignments. We investigate core activities for AI governance with respective roles and responsibilities in practice, on organizational and on AI system layer. We apply design science research to develop a RACI matrix that maps responsibilities to core AI governance activities. This research is based on a literature review and evaluation of interviews with nine AI governance leaders from multinational organizations. Our findings demonstrate that effective AI governance requires a multidisciplinary approach with both centralized accountability through C-level executives and decentralized responsibility through specialized AI roles. The research provides practical guidance for companies establishing AI governance structures while addressing a significant gap in the literature.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Governance in Large-Scale Organizations: Who is Responsible for What?

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI Governance in Large-Scale Organizations: Who is Responsible for What?

article en

Abstract

This paper examines the distribution of responsibility and accountability for AI governance in large-scale organizations. Despite the growing importance of AI governance, existing literature lacks clear guidance for the incorporation into organizational structures and role assignments. We investigate core activities for AI governance with respective roles and responsibilities in practice, on organizational and on AI system layer. We apply design science research to develop a RACI matrix that maps responsibilities to core AI governance activities. This research is based on a literature review and evaluation of interviews with nine AI governance leaders from multinational organizations. Our findings demonstrate that effective AI governance requires a multidisciplinary approach with both centralized accountability through C-level executives and decentralized responsibility through specialized AI roles. The research provides practical guidance for companies establishing AI governance structures while addressing a significant gap in the literature.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI Governance in Large-Scale Organizations: Who is Responsible for What? · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS