Розсіяний склероз: сучасний діагностичний алгоритм у клінічній практиці

This article addresses the diagnostic challenges of multiple sclerosis (MS). The criteria for diagnosing this disease are briefly considered in a historical aspect. It is demonstrated that the main principles have remained unchanged throughout time. The diagnosis of MS requires confirmation of the spatial dissemination (DIS) of the demyelinating process, meaning its presence in different regions of the CNS, and to prove the chronic nature of the disease (DIT). Methods for confirming these criteria have improved over time — initially, the basis was only clinical symptoms, then laboratory and technological studies were added, which allowed for faster diagnosis and earlier initiation of treatment.Today we use the diagnostic criteria that were proposed by a team of neurologists led by Professor I. McDonald, revised in 2017. These criteria are not intended for the differential diagnosis of MS but are useful for excluding other possible conditions. The diagnostic algorithm of these criteria is based on the history (number of exacerbations), topical diagnostics (number of lesions in the CNS according to neurological status and topical diagnosis), MRI examination (presence of lesions in different parts of the brain and spinal cord), presence of activity of these lesions according to MRI data (accumulation of contrast agent) and results of cerebrospinal fluid analysis (detection of oligoclonal immunoglobulins of type II or III).The article presents two clinical cases of patients, in whom MS was suspected, but to confirm the diagnosis it was necessary to conduct all necessary studies and perform a full diagnostic algorithm according to the criteria of McDonald, 2017. After these actions, the diagnosis of MS was confirmed in one patient, and in the other it was excluded.At the end of the article, information is provided about the prepared revision of the criteria of McDonald, 2017. At the ECTRIMS 2024 congress, new revised criteria were presented, which had the following additions: it was proposed to include the optic nerve as a fifth topography, add two MRI features ­ the central vein sign (CVS) and the paramagnetic rim lesion (PRL), and include a new diagnostic laboratory marker that has been shown to be accurate for identifying MS — free kappa light chains.

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific periodicals of Ukraine
Published
2025-03-28
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Розсіяний склероз: сучасний діагностичний алгоритм у клінічній практиці

Scientific periodicals of Ukraine
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Розсіяний склероз: сучасний діагностичний алгоритм у клінічній практиці

article en

Abstract

This article addresses the diagnostic challenges of multiple sclerosis (MS). The criteria for diagnosing this disease are briefly considered in a historical aspect. It is demonstrated that the main principles have remained unchanged throughout time. The diagnosis of MS requires confirmation of the spatial dissemination (DIS) of the demyelinating process, meaning its presence in different regions of the CNS, and to prove the chronic nature of the disease (DIT). Methods for confirming these criteria have improved over time — initially, the basis was only clinical symptoms, then laboratory and technological studies were added, which allowed for faster diagnosis and earlier initiation of treatment.Today we use the diagnostic criteria that were proposed by a team of neurologists led by Professor I. McDonald, revised in 2017. These criteria are not intended for the differential diagnosis of MS but are useful for excluding other possible conditions. The diagnostic algorithm of these criteria is based on the history (number of exacerbations), topical diagnostics (number of lesions in the CNS according to neurological status and topical diagnosis), MRI examination (presence of lesions in different parts of the brain and spinal cord), presence of activity of these lesions according to MRI data (accumulation of contrast agent) and results of cerebrospinal fluid analysis (detection of oligoclonal immunoglobulins of type II or III).The article presents two clinical cases of patients, in whom MS was suspected, but to confirm the diagnosis it was necessary to conduct all necessary studies and perform a full diagnostic algorithm according to the criteria of McDonald, 2017. After these actions, the diagnosis of MS was confirmed in one patient, and in the other it was excluded.At the end of the article, information is provided about the prepared revision of the criteria of McDonald, 2017. At the ECTRIMS 2024 congress, new revised criteria were presented, which had the following additions: it was proposed to include the optic nerve as a fifth topography, add two MRI features ­ the central vein sign (CVS) and the paramagnetic rim lesion (PRL), and include a new diagnostic laboratory marker that has been shown to be accurate for identifying MS — free kappa light chains.

Scientific periodicals of Ukraine
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.