Who Do We Think Should Go to the Stars? Using Social Role Theory to Predict Perceived Job Classifications in Space Industry Candidates.

The aerospace industry has long been known for its fast-tempo operations and technological achievement. However, this field has failed to keep pace with implementing diversity, equity, and inclusion research. Previous research has highlighted a formidable environment for women and minorities in other science, technology, engineering, and math-related fields as they confront issues that impede their attainment of high-paying and prestigious positions. The existing research does not investigate public perceptual biases toward the suitability of individuals based on their genders and ethnicities to human space flight roles. Therefore, the purpose of this dissertation is to bridge this knowledge gap by exploring the effects of sex and racial-based biases toward workers in the space industry. Using Social Role Theory as a theoretical foundation, an online card sort study was conducted in which participants assigned specific human space flight jobs to images portraying candidates of varying sex (male or female) and ethnicity (Caucasian, African, Hispanic, or Asian descent). Participant sex, participant age, and participant exposure to aviation were also examined to understand how they might affect job placement. The data from this study supported each of the hypotheses, demonstrating that candidate gender/ethnicity, participant gender, participant age, and prior exposure to aviation do differentially influence job placement. The results of this study provide empirical support for Social Role Theory and provide a foundation for future space organizations, both public and private, to bolster institutional policy, develop new and sustainable practices for hiring and retaining individuals with diverse backgrounds, and ensure fair workplaces.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Space exploration and regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Do We Think Should Go to the Stars? Using Social Role Theory to Predict Perceived Job Classifications in Space Industry Candidates.

Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)
Space exploration and regulation
article

Who Do We Think Should Go to the Stars? Using Social Role Theory to Predict Perceived Job Classifications in Space Industry Candidates.

article en

Abstract

The aerospace industry has long been known for its fast-tempo operations and technological achievement. However, this field has failed to keep pace with implementing diversity, equity, and inclusion research. Previous research has highlighted a formidable environment for women and minorities in other science, technology, engineering, and math-related fields as they confront issues that impede their attainment of high-paying and prestigious positions. The existing research does not investigate public perceptual biases toward the suitability of individuals based on their genders and ethnicities to human space flight roles. Therefore, the purpose of this dissertation is to bridge this knowledge gap by exploring the effects of sex and racial-based biases toward workers in the space industry. Using Social Role Theory as a theoretical foundation, an online card sort study was conducted in which participants assigned specific human space flight jobs to images portraying candidates of varying sex (male or female) and ethnicity (Caucasian, African, Hispanic, or Asian descent). Participant sex, participant age, and participant exposure to aviation were also examined to understand how they might affect job placement. The data from this study supported each of the hypotheses, demonstrating that candidate gender/ethnicity, participant gender, participant age, and prior exposure to aviation do differentially influence job placement. The results of this study provide empirical support for Social Role Theory and provide a foundation for future space organizations, both public and private, to bolster institutional policy, develop new and sustainable practices for hiring and retaining individuals with diverse backgrounds, and ensure fair workplaces.

Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Space exploration and regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who Do We Think Should Go to the Stars? Using Social Role Theory to Predict Perceived Job Classifications in Space Industry Candidates. · Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS